Thomas E. Kauper
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Merger and Competition Analysis
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Economic Theory and Institutions
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Digital Platforms and Economics
Papers in
-
- Merger and Competition Analysis 7
- Legal and Constitutional Studies 2
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 1
-
- Corporate Governance and Law 3
- Diverse Legal and Medical Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Richard A. Posner (1 shared paper)Edward A. Snyder (1 shared paper)Peter W. Martin (1 shared paper)Charles Donahue (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Michigan Law Review (5 papers)California Law Review (3 papers)Law and Contemporary Problems (1 paper)The Antitrust Bulletin (2 papers)Fordham international law journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas E. Kauper
11 papers receiving 187 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Economics and Econometrics 176
- Strategy and Management 90
- Marketing 54
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 40
- Accounting 34
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Kauper
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Kauper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Kauper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Kauper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Kauper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Kauper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Kauper. The network helps show where Thomas E. Kauper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Kauper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 176 | |
| 2 | The Problem of Market Definition Under EC Competition Law | 1996 | 11 |
| 3 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 4 | 1975 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1968 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 13 | ANTITRUST AND THE PROFESSIONS: AN OVERVIEW | 2016 | 1 |
| 14 | ARTICLE 86, EXCESSIVE PRICES, AND REFUSALS TO DEAL | 2016 | 0 |
About Thomas E. Kauper
Thomas E. Kauper is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations, Law and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Merger and Competition Analysis (7 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (3 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (2 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), European and International Law Studies (1 paper), Diverse Legal and Medical Studies (1 paper), European and International Contract Law (1 paper) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (176 citations), Strategy and Management (90 citations), Marketing (54 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (40 citations) and Accounting (34 citations). Thomas E. Kauper has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Posner, Edward A. Snyder, Peter W. Martin and Charles Donahue. Their work appears in journals such as Michigan Law Review, California Law Review, Law and Contemporary Problems, The Antitrust Bulletin and Fordham international law journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.