Charles Donahue
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Classics top 2%
- History top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Norma AdamsMaryanne KowaleskiThomas E. KauperPeter W. MartinAlan WatsonA. Arthur SchillerAlfred E. KahnBrian P. Levacκ
- Topics
- Medieval Literature and History (10 papers)Historical Legal Studies and Society (7 papers)Theology and Canon Law Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSingapore
In The Last Decade
Charles Donahue
21 papers receiving 119 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Political Science and International Relations 88
- Classics 78
- History 63
- Economics and Econometrics 45
- Sociology and Political Science 37
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Donahue
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Donahue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Donahue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Donahue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Donahue
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Donahue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Donahue. The network helps show where Charles Donahue may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Donahue
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Donahue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Donahue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Donahue. Charles Donahue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | Medieval and Early Modern Lex Mercatoria: An Attempt at the Probatio Diabolica | 12 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | The records of the medieval ecclesiastical courts : reports of the Working Group on Church Court Records | 0 |
| 9 | Why the history of canon law is not written | 2 |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Select cases from the ecclesiastical courts of the Province of Canterbury c. 1200-1301 | 15 |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Charles Donahue
Charles Donahue is a scholar working on Classics, Religious studies and Law, having authored 37 papers that have together received 196 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (10 papers), Historical Legal Studies and Society (7 papers) and Theology and Canon Law Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (78 citations), History (63 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (88 citations). Charles Donahue has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Norma Adams, Maryanne Kowaleski, Thomas E. Kauper, Peter W. Martin, Alan Watson, A. Arthur Schiller, Alfred E. Kahn, Brian P. Levacκ, William G. Shepherd and Harry M. Trebing. Their work appears in journals such as The Yale Law Journal, Michigan Law Review and Law and Contemporary Problems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.