Johan Stennek

593 citations
19 papers · 183 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Johan Stennek

18 papers receiving 147 citations

Peers

Johan Stennek
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Marketing 47
  • Economics and Econometrics 137
  • Strategy and Management 65
  • Accounting 46
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 30
Replace Thomas E. Kauper with:
Thomas E. Kauper United States
Irina Suleymanova Germany
Sam Hariharan United States
Uday Bhanu Sinha India
Wladimir Raymond Netherlands
Gregor Langus United Kingdom
Vincenzo Mollisi Italy
Juan Ortner United States
Lesley Potters Italy
Yasuhiko Nakamura Japan
Johan Stennek relative to Thomas E. Kauper United States Thomas E. Kauper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Thomas E. Kauper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Stennek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Stennek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Stennek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Stennek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Stennek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Stennek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Stennek. The network helps show where Johan Stennek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Johan Stennek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Stennek Line = papers co-authored together Johan Stennek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200724
2 201324
3
Essays on information-processing and competition
199422
4 200020
5 200519
6 199914
7 200013
8 200912
9 20039
10 20009
11
EU Merger Control and Small Member State Interests
20024
12
Should Mergers Be Controlled
20002
13 20052
14 19942
15 20082
16 19972
17
The Survival Value Of Assuming Others To Be Rational
20001
18
The efficiency defense in merger analysis
19991
19 20191

About Johan Stennek

Johan Stennek is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research and Strategy and Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Merger and Competition Analysis (13 papers), Economic theories and models (5 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Game Theory and Applications (4 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (3 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (2 papers) and Digital Platforms and Economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (47 citations), Economics and Econometrics (137 citations), Strategy and Management (65 citations), Accounting (46 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (30 citations). Johan Stennek has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sven‐Olof Fridolfsson, Jonas Björnerstedt, Henrik Horn, Thomas Tangerås, Frank Verboven and Lars‐Hendrik Röller. Their work appears in journals such as Scandinavian Journal of Economics, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Experimental Economics, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy and Information Economics and Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact