Thomas E. Beckert

673 total citations
8 papers, 532 citations indexed

About

Thomas E. Beckert is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas E. Beckert has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 532 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Pharmaceutical Science, 3 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 2 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Thomas E. Beckert's work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (8 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (4 papers) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers). Thomas E. Beckert is often cited by papers focused on Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (8 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (4 papers) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers). Thomas E. Beckert collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Iran. Thomas E. Beckert's co-authors include James C. Price, Vishal Gupta, Alyson Connor, Ian R. Wilding, Robert A. Scott, Ewart T. Cole, Dominique Cadé, Peter Schmidt, Hans-Ulrich Petereit and James W. McGinity and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Powder Technology and Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy.

In The Last Decade

Thomas E. Beckert

8 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas E. Beckert United States	7	397	105	75	63	58	8	532
Dominique Cadé United Kingdom	10	386 1.0×	84 0.8×	126 1.7×	48 0.8×	83 1.4×	10	647
Gary E. Parsons United Kingdom	8	230 0.6×	93 0.9×	24 0.3×	50 0.8×	26 0.4×	9	418
P. Bhaskar India	15	379 1.0×	63 0.6×	162 2.2×	12 0.2×	50 0.9×	26	570
Arati Deshpande United States	7	494 1.2×	49 0.5×	54 0.7×	74 1.2×	82 1.4×	9	626
Ewart T. Cole Switzerland	13	751 1.9×	107 1.0×	129 1.7×	90 1.4×	114 2.0×	17	999
J. Balasubramaniam India	13	459 1.2×	35 0.3×	68 0.9×	23 0.4×	77 1.3×	32	667
N. Rouge Switzerland	6	352 0.9×	55 0.5×	35 0.5×	71 1.1×	40 0.7×	9	466
Timuçin Uğurlu Türkiye	8	195 0.5×	53 0.5×	66 0.9×	30 0.5×	33 0.6×	22	331
Anand Panchakshari Gadad India	17	495 1.2×	33 0.3×	77 1.0×	31 0.5×	138 2.4×	57	733
Sevgi Takka Türkiye	14	424 1.1×	24 0.2×	91 1.2×	34 0.5×	183 3.2×	25	727

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Beckert

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Beckert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Beckert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Beckert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Beckert

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Beckert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Beckert. The network helps show where Thomas E. Beckert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas E. Beckert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas E. Beckert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas E. Beckert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas E. Beckert. Thomas E. Beckert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Petereit, Hans-Ulrich, et al.. (2003). Properties of enteric coated sodium valproate pellets. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 264(1-2). 85–96. 32 indexed citations

Cole, Ewart T., Robert A. Scott, Alyson Connor, et al.. (2002). Enteric coated HPMC capsules designed to achieve intestinal targeting. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 231(1). 83–95. 180 indexed citations

Gupta, Vishal, et al.. (2002). Investigation of Potential Ionic Interactions Between Anionic and Cationic Polymethacrylates of Multiple Coatings of Novel Colonic Delivery System. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 28(2). 207–215. 17 indexed citations

Rafiee‐Tehrani, Morteza, et al.. (2001). Acrylic Resins as Rate-Controlling Membranes in Novel Formulation of a Nine-Day 17β-Estradiol Transdermal Delivery System: In Vitro and Release Modifier Effect Evaluation. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 27(5). 431–437. 5 indexed citations

Beckert, Thomas E., et al.. (2001). A novel pH- and time-based multi-unit potential colonic drug delivery system. II. Optimization of multiple response variables. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 213(1-2). 93–102. 77 indexed citations

Gupta, Vishal, Thomas E. Beckert, & James C. Price. (2001). A novel pH- and time-based multi-unit potential colonic drug delivery system. I. Development. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 213(1-2). 83–91. 141 indexed citations

Beckert, Thomas E., et al.. (1998). Compression of enteric-coated pellets to disintegrating tablets: uniformity of dosage units. Powder Technology. 96(3). 248–254. 18 indexed citations

Beckert, Thomas E., et al.. (1996). Compression of enteric-coated pellets to disintegrating tablets. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 143(1). 13–23. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact