Thomas D. Landis
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Soil Science top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- R. Kasten DumroeseMary L. DuryeaJohn G. MexalDiane L. HaaseJeremiah R. PintoAnthony S. DavisNancy MorganRobin Rose
- Topics
- Seedling growth and survival studies (40 papers)Rangeland and Wildlife Management (14 papers)Growth and nutrition in plants (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas D. Landis
64 papers receiving 937 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 774
- Plant Science 734
- Soil Science 198
- Global and Planetary Change 165
- Ecology 146
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Landis
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Landis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Landis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Landis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Landis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Landis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Landis. The network helps show where Thomas D. Landis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas D. Landis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas D. Landis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas D. Landis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas D. Landis. Thomas D. Landis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 88 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | Growing container seedlings: Three considerations | 1 |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | Containers [Chapter 7] | 1 |
| 6 | Contenedores: Aspectos tecnicos, biologicos y economicos | 1 |
| 7 | 51 | |
| 8 | Fertigation - Injecting soluble fertilizers into the irrigation system: Part 2 | 1 |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | Seedling quality tests: plant moisture stress | 1 |
| 12 | National proceedings: forest and conservation nursery associations-1999, 2000, and 2001 | 24 |
| 13 | Managing Seedborne Diseases in Western Forest Nurseries | 10 |
| 14 | Target seedling concepts: height and diameter. | 121 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Black stain root disease of Pinyon Pine in Colorado. | 7 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Thomas D. Landis
Thomas D. Landis is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil Science and Plant Science, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seedling growth and survival studies (40 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (14 papers) and Growth and nutrition in plants (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (774 citations), Soil Science (198 citations) and Plant Science (734 citations). Thomas D. Landis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include R. Kasten Dumroese, Mary L. Duryea, John G. Mexal, Diane L. Haase, Jeremiah R. Pinto, Anthony S. Davis, Nancy Morgan, Robin Rose, Scott Riley and David R. Dreesen. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Science, Journal of Forestry and New Forests.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.