New Forests

1.7k papers and 31.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in New Forests in the last decades have received a total of 31.8k indexed citations. Papers published in New Forests usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.1k papers), Plant Science (781 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (464 papers) specifically the topics of Forest ecology and management (622 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (609 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (261 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Forests are Steven C. Grossnickle, Douglass F. Jacobs, Mary Jo W. Godt, Susan L. Sherman‐Broyles, J. L. Hamrick, R. F. Sutton, V. R. Timmer, Azamal Husen, Anthony S. Davis and W. S. Dvorak.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in New Forests

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New Forests. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Forests.

Countries where authors publish in New Forests

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Forests. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Forests with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Forests more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025