C. Buschena

1.4k total citations
9 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

C. Buschena is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Biomaterials. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Buschena has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 6 papers in Plant Science and 3 papers in Biomaterials. Recurrent topics in C. Buschena's work include Seedling growth and survival studies (4 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (3 papers) and Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals (3 papers). C. Buschena is often cited by papers focused on Seedling growth and survival studies (4 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (3 papers) and Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals (3 papers). C. Buschena collaborates with scholars based in United States. C. Buschena's co-authors include Mark G. Tjoelker, Peter B. Reich, Michael B. Walters, Dirk Vanderklein, Robert K. Dixon, José‐Luis Machado, Johannes M. H. Knops, David Tilman, Keith Wrage and Edward Sucoff and has published in prestigious journals such as New Phytologist, Plant and Soil and Journal of Environmental Quality.

In The Last Decade

C. Buschena

9 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Buschena United States 8 642 601 486 218 212 9 1.1k
K. S. Werk Germany 16 565 0.9× 649 1.1× 386 0.8× 356 1.6× 133 0.6× 19 1.1k
Dean H. Gjerstad United States 22 856 1.3× 523 0.9× 587 1.2× 103 0.5× 130 0.6× 58 1.3k
Oscar W. Nagel Netherlands 8 500 0.8× 989 1.6× 478 1.0× 196 0.9× 284 1.3× 10 1.5k
Thomas W. Jurik United States 23 606 0.9× 920 1.5× 686 1.4× 285 1.3× 98 0.5× 39 1.5k
D. N. Fife Australia 12 700 1.1× 505 0.8× 461 0.9× 76 0.3× 318 1.5× 17 1.1k
Ülle Püttsepp Estonia 13 322 0.5× 554 0.9× 244 0.5× 195 0.9× 310 1.5× 13 988
Dirk Vanderklein United States 12 820 1.3× 700 1.2× 814 1.7× 221 1.0× 170 0.8× 23 1.5k
Antonino Di Iorio Italy 21 347 0.5× 628 1.0× 350 0.7× 103 0.5× 260 1.2× 43 1.1k
Manuel Olmo Spain 14 470 0.7× 552 0.9× 310 0.6× 229 1.1× 369 1.7× 20 1.1k
Driss Meziane Canada 7 493 0.8× 468 0.8× 333 0.7× 200 0.9× 155 0.7× 10 934

Countries citing papers authored by C. Buschena

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Buschena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Buschena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Buschena more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Buschena

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Buschena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Buschena. The network helps show where C. Buschena may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Buschena

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Buschena. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Buschena based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Buschena. C. Buschena is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Reich, Peter B., C. Buschena, Mark G. Tjoelker, et al.. (2003). Variation in growth rate and ecophysiology among 34 grassland and savanna species under contrasting N supply: a test of functional group differences. New Phytologist. 157(3). 617–631. 179 indexed citations
2.
Reich, Peter B., Michael B. Walters, Mark G. Tjoelker, Dirk Vanderklein, & C. Buschena. (1998). Photosynthesis and respiration rates depend on leaf and root morphology and nitrogen concentration in nine boreal tree species differing in relative growth rate. Functional Ecology. 12(3). 395–405. 428 indexed citations
3.
Reich, Peter B., Mark G. Tjoelker, Michael B. Walters, Dirk Vanderklein, & C. Buschena. (1998). Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal tree species grown in high and low light. Functional Ecology. 12(3). 327–338. 397 indexed citations
4.
Ocamb, Cynthia M., C. Buschena, & Joseph O’Brien. (1997). Microbial mixtures for biological control of Fusarium diseases of tree seedlings. 4 indexed citations
5.
Buschena, C., R. L. Doudrick, & Neil A. Anderson. (1992). Persistence of Laccaria spp. as ectomycorrhizal symbionts of container-grown black spruce. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 22(12). 1883–1887. 17 indexed citations
6.
DeWald, Laura E., Edward Sucoff, Tsutomu Ohno, & C. Buschena. (1990). Response of northern red oak (Quercusrubra) seedlings to soil solution aluminum. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 20(3). 331–336. 12 indexed citations
7.
Sucoff, Edward, C. Buschena, & Paul R. Bloom. (1989). Response of honelocust (Gleditsia triacanthos L.) to soil solution aluminium. Plant and Soil. 113(1). 93–99. 10 indexed citations
8.
Sucoff, Edward, et al.. (1988). Growth and Nutrient Content of Red Spruce Seedlings in Soil Amended with Aluminum. Journal of Environmental Quality. 17(4). 666–672. 18 indexed citations
9.
Dixon, Robert K. & C. Buschena. (1988). Response of ectomycorrhizalPinus banksiana andPicea glauca to heavy metals in soil. Plant and Soil. 105(2). 265–271. 83 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026