Thomas Cole

633 total citations
11 papers, 295 citations indexed

About

Thomas Cole is a scholar working on Small Animals, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Computational Theory and Mathematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Cole has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 295 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Small Animals, 2 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 2 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics. Recurrent topics in Thomas Cole's work include Animal testing and alternatives (7 papers), Immunotoxicology and immune responses (2 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (2 papers). Thomas Cole is often cited by papers focused on Animal testing and alternatives (7 papers), Immunotoxicology and immune responses (2 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (2 papers). Thomas Cole collaborates with scholars based in Italy, Germany and Belgium. Thomas Cole's co-authors include Sebastian Hoffmann, Agnieszka Kinsner‐Ovaskainen, Pilar Prieto, Thomas Härtung, Sandra Coecke, Christian A. Bieler, Inge Mangelsdorf, Andrew Worth, Valérie Zuang and Chantra Eskes and has published in prestigious journals such as Toxicology Letters, Journal of Chromatography B and Toxicology in Vitro.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Cole

10 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

Thomas Cole
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Small Animals 152
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 76
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 72
  • Biomedical Engineering 43
  • Plant Science 36
Replace D.M. Bagley with:
D.M. Bagley United States
Marleen Pauwels Belgium
Qingda Zang United States
Phil Botham United Kingdom
Camilla Bernasconi Italy
Bruno Hubesch Germany
Christiane Wiemann Germany
Tatyana Y. Doktorova Belgium
Richard Cubberley United Kingdom
Sharon B. Stuard United States
D.M. Bagley United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Thomas Cole
Thomas Cole · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Thomas Cole
Thomas Cole · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Cole. The network helps show where Thomas Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Cole

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Cole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Cole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Cole. Thomas Cole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 39
3 26
4 4
5 30
6 30
7 62
8
ECVAM Bottom-Up/Top-Down Testing Approach: Testing Strategy to Reduce/Replace the Draize Eye Test and Validation/Regulatory Acceptance of In Vitro Assays: Current Status
1
9 30
10 40
11 31

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026