Phil Botham
Impact in
- Small Animals top 5%
- Animal testing and alternatives
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Chemical Safety and Risk Management 2
-
- Animal testing and alternatives 6
- Co-authors
- Richard Billington (4 shared papers)Bennard van Ravenzwaay (4 shared papers)Richard J. Lewis (3 shared papers)David Eric Lees (2 shared papers)Torbjörn Malmfors (1 shared paper)Bernhard Stahl (2 shared papers)Alan R. Boobis (4 shared papers)Karin S. Bentley (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Critical Reviews in Toxicology (5 papers)Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (3 papers)Toxicological Sciences (1 paper)Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (1 paper)Archives of Toxicology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Phil Botham
16 papers receiving 244 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Small Animals 72
- Chemical Health and Safety 5
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 80
- Pharmacology 30
- Cancer Research 43
Countries citing papers authored by Phil Botham
This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Botham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Botham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Botham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Botham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Botham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Botham. The network helps show where Phil Botham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phil Botham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 15 | Why laboratory rats are here to stay. | 1992 | 1 |
| 16 | 2025 | 1 |
About Phil Botham
Phil Botham is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, Small Animals, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research and Dermatology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (8 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (6 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (3 papers), Agricultural safety and regulations (3 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (3 papers), Chemical Safety and Risk Management (2 papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (72 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (5 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (80 citations), Pharmacology (30 citations) and Cancer Research (43 citations). Phil Botham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard Billington, Bennard van Ravenzwaay, Richard J. Lewis, David Eric Lees, Torbjörn Malmfors, Bernhard Stahl, Alan R. Boobis, Karin S. Bentley, Werner Kobel and Christa Hennes. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Reviews in Toxicology, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Toxicological Sciences, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals and Archives of Toxicology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.