Phil Botham

602 total citations
16 papers, 265 citations indexed

About

Phil Botham is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, Phil Botham has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 265 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 8 papers in Cancer Research and 6 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in Phil Botham's work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (8 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (6 papers) and Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers). Phil Botham is often cited by papers focused on Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (8 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (6 papers) and Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers). Phil Botham collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Phil Botham's co-authors include Richard Billington, Richard J. Lewis, Bennard van Ravenzwaay, David Eric Lees, Bernhard Stahl, Torbjörn Malmfors, Karin S. Bentley, Werner Kobel, Alan R. Boobis and Christa Hennes and has published in prestigious journals such as Toxicological Sciences, Archives of Toxicology and Critical Reviews in Toxicology.

In The Last Decade

Phil Botham

16 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Phil Botham United Kingdom 9 80 72 51 48 43 16 265
Richard Cubberley United Kingdom 14 115 1.4× 121 1.7× 36 0.7× 80 1.7× 34 0.8× 28 503
Robert P. Felton United States 10 211 2.6× 27 0.4× 76 1.5× 102 2.1× 69 1.6× 15 505
Hyun‐Ok Ku South Korea 9 90 1.1× 15 0.2× 66 1.3× 102 2.1× 39 0.9× 27 344
J. P. Payan France 11 242 3.0× 39 0.5× 59 1.2× 51 1.1× 95 2.2× 24 524
Brian N. Meyer United States 9 51 0.6× 11 0.2× 59 1.2× 85 1.8× 12 0.3× 17 284
Jian‐Dong Duan United States 11 64 0.8× 23 0.3× 117 2.3× 68 1.4× 148 3.4× 23 319
Gihan G. Moustafa Egypt 13 119 1.5× 8 0.1× 79 1.5× 74 1.5× 28 0.7× 26 413
Ahmed Kousba United States 13 171 2.1× 10 0.1× 84 1.6× 320 6.7× 53 1.2× 20 524
Soledad Duk Chile 3 159 2.0× 29 0.4× 147 2.9× 163 3.4× 323 7.5× 7 490
Tommy Jansson Sweden 10 73 0.9× 17 0.2× 80 1.6× 41 0.9× 135 3.1× 16 231

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Botham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Botham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Botham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Botham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Botham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Botham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Botham. The network helps show where Phil Botham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phil Botham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phil Botham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phil Botham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phil Botham. Phil Botham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
3.
Boobis, Alan R., et al.. (2024). The new normal chemical landscape: the future of risk assessment toward optimum consumer safety. Toxicology Research. 13(2). tfae016–tfae016. 4 indexed citations
4.
Lewis, Richard W., Javier Arroyo, Phil Botham, et al.. (2024). Considerations for the development of guidance on dose level selection for developmental and reproductive toxicity studies. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 148. 105585–105585. 5 indexed citations
5.
Najjar, Abdulkarim, Ans Punt, John F. Wambaugh, et al.. (2022). Towards best use and regulatory acceptance of generic physiologically based kinetic (PBK) models for in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) in chemical risk assessment. Archives of Toxicology. 96(12). 3407–3419. 24 indexed citations
6.
Heusinkveld, Harm J., Hedwig Braakhuis, Phil Botham, et al.. (2020). Towards a mechanism-based approach for the prediction of nongenotoxic carcinogenic potential of agrochemicals. Critical Reviews in Toxicology. 50(9). 725–739. 24 indexed citations
7.
Kobel, Werner, Richard Billington, Richard J. Lewis, et al.. (2014). Relevance of the 1-year dog study in assessing human health risks for registration of pesticides. An update to include pesticides registered in Japan. Critical Reviews in Toxicology. 44(10). 842–848. 7 indexed citations
8.
Billington, Richard, Phil Botham, Edward W. Carney, et al.. (2012). Feasibility of the extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (OECD 443). Reproductive Toxicology. 34(3). 331–339. 24 indexed citations
9.
Kobel, Werner, Richard Billington, Richard J. Lewis, et al.. (2009). A 1-year toxicity study in dogs is no longer a scientifically justifiable core data requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides. Critical Reviews in Toxicology. 40(1). 1–15. 24 indexed citations
10.
McGregor, Douglas, Alan R. Boobis, Marco Binaglia, et al.. (2009). Guidance for the classification of carcinogens under the Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). Critical Reviews in Toxicology. 40(3). 245–285. 19 indexed citations
11.
Boverhof, Darrell R., Phil Botham, David Eric Lees, et al.. (2008). Interlaboratory Validation of 1% Pluronic L92 Surfactant as a Suitable, Aqueous Vehicle for Testing Pesticide Formulations Using the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay. Toxicological Sciences. 105(1). 79–85. 11 indexed citations
12.
Botham, Phil, et al.. (2008). On the skin sensitisation potential of rosin and oxidised rosin. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 52(3). 257–263. 16 indexed citations
13.
Botham, Phil. (2003). Acute systemic toxicity—prospects for tiered testing strategies. Toxicology in Vitro. 18(2). 227–230. 92 indexed citations
14.
Combes, Robert D., Michael Balls, Martin D. Barratt, et al.. (2002). An Assessment of Progress in the Use of Alternatives in Toxicity Testing since the Publication of the Report of the Second FRAME Toxicity Committee (1991). Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 30(4). 365–406. 8 indexed citations
15.
Fielder, R.J., Alan R. Boobis, Phil Botham, et al.. (1993). Report of the BTS/UKEMS Working Group on Dose Setting in In-Vivo Mutagenicity Assays. Human & Experimental Toxicology. 12(3). 189–198. 3 indexed citations
16.
Botham, Phil, et al.. (1992). Why laboratory rats are here to stay.. PubMed. 134(1819). 29–30. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026