Thomas C. Messerli

410 citations
19 papers · 158 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas C. Messerli

15 papers receiving 152 citations

Peers

Thomas C. Messerli
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Language and Linguistics 90
  • Literature and Literary Theory 67
  • Human-Computer Interaction 23
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
  • General Social Sciences 10
Replace Laura Alba Juez with:
Laura Alba Juez Spain
Roberta Facchinetti Italy
Alison Gibbons United Kingdom
Laura Hidalgo Downing Spain
Tuija Virtanen Finland
Phoenix Lam Hong Kong
Chiao‐I Tseng Germany
Isaac N. Mwinlaaru Ghana
Ernest W.B. Hess-Lüttich Switzerland
Christoph Schubert Germany
Thomas C. Messerli relative to Laura Alba Juez Spain Laura Alba Juez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Laura Alba Juez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Messerli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Messerli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Messerli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Messerli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Messerli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Messerli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Messerli. The network helps show where Thomas C. Messerli may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Messerli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Messerli Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Messerli links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 202122
2 202120
3 202017
4 201616
5 202315
6 202314
7 201913
8 20219
9 20208
10 20178
11 20235
12 20205
13 20233
14 20202
15 20201
16 20250
17 20220
18 20240
19 20240

About Thomas C. Messerli

Thomas C. Messerli is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 158 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (8 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (6 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Humor Studies and Applications (4 papers), Digital Communication and Language (4 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Subtitles and Audiovisual Media (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (90 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (67 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (23 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (47 citations) and General Social Sciences (10 citations). Thomas C. Messerli has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Miriam A. Locher, Daria Dayter, Daniela Landert, Marta Dynel, J. Berenike Herrmann, Brigitte Gasser, Maria Kraxenberger, Federico Pianzola, Moniek M. Kuijpers and Gerhard Lauer. Their work appears in journals such as Discourse Context & Media, Journal of Pragmatics, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, Perspectives and Lingua.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact