This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Perspectives more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Perspectives.
About Perspectives
The 1.1k papers published in Perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Perspectives usually cover Language and Linguistics (857 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (157 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (151 papers), Communication (77 papers) and General Health Professions (228 papers) specifically the topics of Translation Studies and Practices (756 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (226 papers), Subtitles and Audiovisual Media (168 papers), linguistics and terminology studies (159 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (149 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (144 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (77 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Perspectives are Roberto A. Valdeón, Henrik Gottlieb, Jan‐Louis Kruger, Wei Liu, Joss Moorkens, Jan Pedersen, Peter Low, Meifang Zhang, Pilar Orero and Luc van Doorslaer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.