Daria Dayter

776 citations
24 papers · 324 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daria Dayter

20 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Daria Dayter
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Language and Linguistics 198
  • Human-Computer Interaction 92
  • Literature and Literary Theory 151
  • Communication 45
  • Gender Studies 44
Replace Sage Lambert Graham with:
Sage Lambert Graham United States
Jessica S. Robles United Kingdom
Angela Goddard United Kingdom
Gonen Dori‐Hacohen United States
Christa Dürscheid Switzerland
Eva Ogiermann United Kingdom
Gail Forey Hong Kong
Najma Al Zidjaly Oman
Ruba Fahmi Bataineh Jordan
Pamela Hobbs United States
Daria Dayter relative to Sage Lambert Graham United States Sage Lambert Graham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Sage Lambert Graham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daria Dayter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daria Dayter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daria Dayter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daria Dayter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daria Dayter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daria Dayter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daria Dayter. The network helps show where Daria Dayter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Daria Dayter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daria Dayter Line = papers co-authored together Daria Dayter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201471
2 201534
3 202025
4 201622
5 201621
6
Discursive Self in Microblogging: Speech Acts, Stories and Self-Praise
201618
7 201817
8 201817
9 202114
10 202313
11 201613
12 202312
13 202010
14 20188
15 20218
16 20227
17 20216
18 20165
19 20112
20 20191

About Daria Dayter

Daria Dayter is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Human-Computer Interaction, General Health Professions and Communication, having authored 24 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (15 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (14 papers), Digital Communication and Language (6 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (4 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (198 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (92 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (151 citations), Communication (45 citations) and Gender Studies (44 citations). Daria Dayter has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Sofia Rüdiger, Miriam A. Locher, Susanne Mühleisen, Daniela Landert, Łukasz Grabowski and Axel Bohmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pragmatics, Open Linguistics, Discourse Studies, Pragmatics & beyond. New series and FORUM Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact