Thomas Booth
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 11
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products 3
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 6
-
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 3
- Archeology top 10%
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies 4
- Paleopathology and ancient diseases 3
-
- Forensic and Genetic Research 3
-
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 3
- Co-authors
- Yit‐Heng ChooiMarnix H. MedemaCameron L. M. GilchristCharles E. MillerBarrie WilkinsonMohammad AlanjaryErnest LaceyRobert J. Capon
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Booth
27 papers receiving 465 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Pharmacology 198
- Biotechnology 68
- Molecular Biology 250
- Paleontology 21
- Archeology 28
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Booth
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Booth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Booth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Booth. The network helps show where Thomas Booth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 146 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 17 | The Body Will Eat Itself: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Bone Diagenesis and Funerary Treatment | 2013 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1969 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1968 | 25 |
About Thomas Booth
Thomas Booth is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Archeology, Paleontology, Biotechnology and Oceanography, having authored 29 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (11 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (6 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (4 papers), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (3 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (3 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (3 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (3 papers) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (198 citations), Biotechnology (68 citations), Molecular Biology (250 citations), Paleontology (21 citations) and Archeology (28 citations). Thomas Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yit‐Heng Chooi, Marnix H. Medema, Cameron L. M. Gilchrist, Charles E. Miller, Barrie Wilkinson, Mohammad Alanjary, Ernest Lacey, Robert J. Capon, Silke Alt and Félix Forest. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, BMC Bioinformatics, Mycologia, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry and Chemical Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.