Ling Ding

2.5k citations
89 papers · 1.9k indexed · h-index 24

Impact in

    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
    • Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
    • Marine Sponges and Natural Products

Papers in

    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 43
    • Fungal Biology and Applications 8
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 8

Ling Ding

85 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Ling Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Pharmacology 812
  • Biotechnology 404
  • Organic Chemistry 590
  • Pharmacology 156
  • Toxicology 47
Replace R. Thomas Williamson with:
R. Thomas Williamson United States
Chambers C. Hughes United States
Shu‐Shan Gao China
Sumei Li China
Yoshihide Usami Japan
Yiguang Zhu China
Rebecca J. M. Goss United Kingdom
Jaclyn M. Winter United States
Wenjun Zhang China
Miho Izumikawa Japan
Ling Ding relative to R. Thomas Williamson United States R. Thomas Williamson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
R. Thomas Williamson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling Ding. The network helps show where Ling Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling Ding Line = papers co-authored together Ling Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010172
2 2011143
3 2012129
4 201795
5 201184
6 201379
7 201767
8 201957
9 201555
10 200853
11 201151
12 201244
13 202343
14 201440
15 202038
16 201238
17 200737
18 201236
19 200836
20 201235

About Ling Ding

Ling Ding is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Biotechnology and Genetics, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (43 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (17 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (11 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (8 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (8 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (6 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (5 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (812 citations), Biotechnology (404 citations), Organic Chemistry (590 citations), Pharmacology (156 citations) and Toxicology (47 citations). Ling Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, Germany and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Christian Hertweck, Heinz‐Herbert Fiebig, Armin Maier, Martin Baunach, Wenhan Lin, Zhongli Xu, Helmar Goerls, Gundela Peschel, Song Qin and Jan Münch. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, ChemBioChem, Scientific Reports and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact