Daniel E. Bergan

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
46 papers, 895 citations indexed

About

Daniel E. Bergan is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel E. Bergan has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 895 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 23 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 21 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Daniel E. Bergan's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (22 papers), Social Media and Politics (19 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (10 papers). Daniel E. Bergan is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (22 papers), Social Media and Politics (19 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (10 papers). Daniel E. Bergan collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ukraine. Daniel E. Bergan's co-authors include Alan S. Gerber, Dean Karlan, Dustin Carnahan, Richard T. Cole, Costas Panagopoulos, Sangwon Lee, Peter M. Aronow, Donald P. Green, Steven S. Wildman and Thomas Baldwin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Media Literacy Education, Journal of Communication and The Journal of Politics.

In The Last Decade

Daniel E. Bergan

42 papers receiving 837 citations

Hit Papers

Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the E... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel E. Bergan United States 13 592 380 377 144 70 46 895
Betsy Sinclair United States 16 630 1.1× 647 1.7× 388 1.0× 85 0.6× 119 1.7× 39 1.1k
David Ryfe United States 15 556 0.9× 277 0.7× 941 2.5× 82 0.6× 31 0.4× 37 1.3k
Nathaniel Persily United States 16 534 0.9× 401 1.1× 364 1.0× 77 0.5× 90 1.3× 44 968
Noah Kaplan United States 11 410 0.7× 497 1.3× 136 0.4× 109 0.8× 104 1.5× 23 865
Kees Aarts Netherlands 16 444 0.8× 689 1.8× 342 0.9× 83 0.6× 84 1.2× 66 1.0k
Vanessa Williamson United States 7 583 1.0× 673 1.8× 187 0.5× 92 0.6× 93 1.3× 12 1.1k
Holger Kern United States 13 461 0.8× 423 1.1× 130 0.3× 85 0.6× 175 2.5× 28 929
Tim Groeling United States 12 802 1.4× 588 1.5× 640 1.7× 147 1.0× 66 0.9× 19 1.2k
Mariano Torcal Spain 21 808 1.4× 1.3k 3.3× 432 1.1× 104 0.7× 99 1.4× 89 1.7k
Lorenzo Mosca Italy 15 612 1.0× 577 1.5× 441 1.2× 54 0.4× 37 0.5× 61 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Bergan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Bergan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Bergan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Bergan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Bergan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Bergan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Bergan. The network helps show where Daniel E. Bergan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel E. Bergan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel E. Bergan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel E. Bergan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel E. Bergan. Daniel E. Bergan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bergan, Daniel E., et al.. (2023). Estimating the impact of immediate versus delayed corrections on belief accuracy. Communication Monographs. 90(3). 372–392. 3 indexed citations
2.
Bergan, Daniel E., et al.. (2023). Political expertise, ecological rationality and party cues. Behavioural Public Policy. 10(1). 151–170.
3.
Bergan, Daniel E., Hillary C. Shulman, & Dustin Carnahan. (2023). Discounting constituent attitudes: motivated reasoning, ambiguity, and policymaker perceptions of constituent characteristics. Human Communication Research. 50(1). 53–65.
4.
Bergan, Daniel E., Maria Knight Lapinski, & Shawn Turner. (2022). Do Populists Really Reject Expert Judgment?: Expert Consensus and Support for Clean Water Act Protections. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 34(2). 6 indexed citations
6.
Bergan, Daniel E.. (2021). Does Ability Contribute to Partisan Bias?: Evaluating Scientific Research about Political Topics. Communication Studies. 72(3). 303–318. 3 indexed citations
7.
Bergan, Daniel E., et al.. (2021). Reinforcement in the Aggregate: Partisan Newspaper Circulation and the Presidential Vote, 1900–1928. Journalism Studies. 22(14). 1911–1929. 2 indexed citations
8.
Bergan, Daniel E., et al.. (2021). Promoting the Youth Vote: The Role of Informational Cues and Social Pressure. Political Behavior. 44(4). 2027–2047. 11 indexed citations
9.
Bergan, Daniel E., et al.. (2019). Media Credibility and the Base Rate Fallacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 63(2). 195–210. 3 indexed citations
10.
Bergan, Daniel E., et al.. (2018). Media Literacy and Response to Terror News. Journal of Media Literacy Education. 10(3). 43–56. 2 indexed citations
11.
Manata, Brian, Franklin J. Boster, Gwen M. Wittenbaum, & Daniel E. Bergan. (2018). Assessing the Effects of Partisan Bias at the Group Level of Analysis: A Hidden Profile Experiment. American Politics Research. 47(6). 1283–1302. 1 indexed citations
12.
Keating, David M. & Daniel E. Bergan. (2017). Mapping Political Attitudes: The Impact of Concept Mapping on Ideological Constraint. Communication Studies. 68(4). 439–454. 7 indexed citations
13.
Bergan, Daniel E. & Richard T. Cole. (2014). Call Your Legislator: A Field Experimental Study of the Impact of a Constituency Mobilization Campaign on Legislative Voting. Political Behavior. 37(1). 27–42. 31 indexed citations
14.
Bergan, Daniel E. & Richard T. Cole. (2013). Call Your Legislator: A Field Experimental Study of the Impact of Citizen Contacts on Legislative Voting. 5 indexed citations
15.
Bergan, Daniel E., et al.. (2012). The Perils of Participation: The Effect of Participation Messages on Citizens’ Policy Support. Journal of Public Transportation. 15(2). 137–156. 1 indexed citations
16.
Bergan, Daniel E., et al.. (2012). Issue Ads and the Health Reform Debate. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law. 37(3). 513–549. 8 indexed citations
17.
Fico, Frederick, Stephen Lacy, Steven S. Wildman, et al.. (2012). CITIZEN JOURNALISM SITES AS INFORMATION SUBSTITUTES AND COMPLEMENTS FOR UNITED STATES NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. Digital Journalism. 1(1). 152–168. 34 indexed citations
18.
Bergan, Daniel E.. (2009). The Draft Lottery and Attitudes Towards the Vietnam War. SSRN Electronic Journal.
19.
Rottinghaus, Brandon & Daniel E. Bergan. (2009). The Politics of Requesting Appointments: Congressional Requests in the Appointment and Nomination Process. Political Research Quarterly. 64(1). 31–44. 14 indexed citations
20.
Panagopoulos, Costas & Daniel E. Bergan. (2007). Online Fund-Raising and Contributors in the 2004 Presidential Campaign. Social Science Computer Review. 25(4). 484–493. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026