Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Alkemeyer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Alkemeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Alkemeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Alkemeyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Alkemeyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Alkemeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Alkemeyer. The network helps show where Thomas Alkemeyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Alkemeyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Alkemeyer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Alkemeyer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Alkemeyer. Thomas Alkemeyer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Alkemeyer, Thomas & Nikolaus Buschmann. (2019). Das Imaginäre der Praxis. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 44(S2). 117–138.3 indexed citations
Alkemeyer, Thomas, et al.. (2018). Training als Verflechtungsgeschehen. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research. 48(3). 395–403.1 indexed citations
7.
Alkemeyer, Thomas, et al.. (2016). Bindende Verflechtung. VIERTELJAHRSSCHRIFT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTLICHE PÄDAGOGIK. 92(1). 170–194.3 indexed citations
Alkemeyer, Thomas, et al.. (2015). Praxis denken. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).5 indexed citations
10.
Alkemeyer, Thomas. (2008). Literatur als Ethnographie: Repräsentation und Präsenz der stummen Macht symbolischer Gewalt. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 8(1). 11–31.2 indexed citations
11.
Alkemeyer, Thomas, et al.. (2005). Organisations-entwicklungen und De-Institutionalisierungs-prozesse im Sport.9 indexed citations
12.
Alkemeyer, Thomas, et al.. (2004). Treue zum Stil. BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library).6 indexed citations
13.
Alkemeyer, Thomas, et al.. (2003). Aufs Spiel gesetzte Körper : Aufführungen des Sozialen in Sport und populärer Kultur.2 indexed citations
14.
Alkemeyer, Thomas, et al.. (2003). Habitus und Selbst : zur Irritation der körperlichen Hexis in der populären Kultur.1 indexed citations
Alkemeyer, Thomas, et al.. (2001). „Spitzensport — Chancen und Probleme“. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research. 31(1). 110–114.2 indexed citations
17.
Alkemeyer, Thomas, et al.. (1996). Strangerhood and racism in sports.. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 5(2). 30–52.3 indexed citations
18.
Alkemeyer, Thomas, et al.. (1996). Fremdheit und Rassismus im Sport : Tagung der dvs-Sektion Sportphilosophie vom 9.-10. 9. 1994 in Berlin.1 indexed citations
19.
Alkemeyer, Thomas. (1996). Körper, Kult und Politik : von der "Muskelreligion" Pierre de Coubertins zur Inszenierung von Macht in den Olympischen Spielen von 1936. Campus Verlag eBooks.9 indexed citations
20.
Alkemeyer, Thomas, et al.. (1996). Einleitung - Fremdheit und Rassismus im Sport. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 72. 7–40.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.