Nina Degele

27 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Nina Degele
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Sociology and Political Science 298
  • Gender Studies 161
  • General Health Professions 85
  • Political Science and International Relations 75
  • Social Psychology 48
Replace Gabriele Winker with:
Gabriele Winker Germany
Donna Bobbitt‐Zeher United States
Valerie Bryson United Kingdom
Fiona Robinson Canada
Mitchell Duneier United States
Harmony Newman United States
Steven D. McLaughlin United States
Malin Åkerström Sweden
Irene Levin Norway
Anastasia H. Prokos United States
Nina Degele relative to Gabriele Winker Germany Gabriele Winker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gabriele Winker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Degele

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Degele's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Degele with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Degele more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Degele

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Degele. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Degele. The network helps show where Nina Degele may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Degele

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Degele. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Degele based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Degele. Nina Degele is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 13
2 76
3 21
4 4
5
Schönheit - Erfolg - Macht
1
6 18
7 7
8
Bodification and Beautification: Zur Verkörperung sozialer und kultureller Differenzen durch Schönheitshandeln
1
9
Modernisierungstheorie : eine Einführung
4
10 0
11 0
12 1
13 19
14
Happy together: Soziologie und Gender Studies als paradigmatische Verunsicherungswissenschaften
6
15 1
16 2
17
Informiertes Wissen : eine Wissenssoziologie der computerisierten Gesellschaft
8
18 13
19 2
20
Der überforderte Computer : zur Soziologie menschlicher und künstlicher Intelligenz
2

About Nina Degele

Nina Degele is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies, having authored 30 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sociology and Education Studies (12 papers), German Social Sciences and History (3 papers) and Public Administration and Political Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (161 citations), Sociology and Political Science (298 citations) and Public Administration (19 citations). Nina Degele has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Gabriele Winker, Christian Schneickert, Thomas Alkemeyer, Nicole J. Saam, Hans J. Pongratz, Hartmut Winkler, Heike Weber, Michael Nagenborg, Sigrid Schmitz and Hannelore Bublitz. Their work appears in journals such as Science Technology & Human Values, Creativity and Innovation Management and European Journal of Women s Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026