Theo D’haen
-
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies 10
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 7
- Crime and Detective Fiction Studies 2
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Philippine History and Culture 2
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- European Cultural and National Identity 5
- Religious studies top 10%
-
- Translation Studies and Practices 10
-
- Visual Culture and Art Theory 2
-
- Travel Writing and Literature 2
- Co-authors
- Hans BertensDavid DamroschDjelal KadirPieter VermeulenJan BaetensCésar DomínguezPiotr SztompkaGiuseppe Longo
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)Journal of American History (1 paper)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Theo D’haen
47 papers receiving 278 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Literature and Literary Theory 93
- Cultural Studies 46
- Anthropology 47
- Sociology and Political Science 164
- Religious studies 15
Countries citing papers authored by Theo D’haen
This map shows the geographic impact of Theo D’haen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theo D’haen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theo D’haen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Theo D’haen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theo D’haen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theo D’haen. The network helps show where Theo D’haen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Theo D’haen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 5 | Cultural Memory and the Postcolonial | 2014 | 1 |
| 6 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 196 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 11 | What i post/colonial literature, and why are they saving such terrible things about it? | 1997 | 1 |
| 12 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1986 | 1 |
About Theo D’haen
Theo D’haen is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 67 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Translation Studies and Practices (10 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (10 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (7 papers), European Cultural and National Identity (5 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (2 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers), Philippine History and Culture (2 papers) and Travel Writing and Literature (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (93 citations), Cultural Studies (46 citations) and Anthropology (47 citations). Theo D’haen has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Hans Bertens, David Damrosch, Djelal Kadir, Pieter Vermeulen, Jan Baetens, César Domínguez, Piotr Sztompka, Giuseppe Longo, Charles Caramello and Ole Helby Petersen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of American History and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.