Thea King
Impact in
- Endocrinology top 2%
- Escherichia coli research studies
- Genetics top 5%
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Genetic diversity and population structure
Papers in
-
- Escherichia coli research studies 4
-
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety 4
- Microbial Inactivation Methods 3
- Co-authors
- Thomas FerenciLucinda S. McRobbJohn S. MattickMichel GeorgesS. S. MooreMegan J. Osmond-McLeodDavid J. HetzelLesley L. Duffy
- Journals
- Journal of Bacteriology (2 papers)Molecular & Cellular Proteomics (2 papers)Trends in Food Science & Technology (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Applied and Environmental Microbiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Thea King
16 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Endocrinology 178
- Genetics 604
- Food Science 343
- Biotechnology 158
- Molecular Biology 599
Countries citing papers authored by Thea King
This map shows the geographic impact of Thea King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thea King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thea King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thea King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thea King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thea King. The network helps show where Thea King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thea King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 125 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 82 | |
| 4 | Food safety for food security: Relationship between global megatrends and developments in food safety Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 373 |
| 5 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 63 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 82 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 43 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 150 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 201 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 26 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 355 |
About Thea King
Thea King is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Biotechnology, Genetics, Food Science and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (8 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (4 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (4 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (3 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (2 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (2 papers) and Food Safety and Hygiene (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (178 citations), Genetics (604 citations), Food Science (343 citations), Biotechnology (158 citations) and Molecular Biology (599 citations). Thea King has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Ferenci, Lucinda S. McRobb, John S. Mattick, Michel Georges, S. S. Moore, Megan J. Osmond-McLeod, David J. Hetzel, Lesley L. Duffy, Martin Cole and Jeffrey M. Farber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Trends in Food Science & Technology, PLoS ONE and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.