Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage
This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Baker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Baker. The network helps show where Ted Baker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ted Baker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ted Baker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ted Baker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ted Baker. Ted Baker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Powell, E. Erin & Ted Baker. (2012). ASPIRATIONS, BEHAVIORS AND COMMITMENTS: SOCIAL IDENTITY AND ENTREPRENEURIAL RESILIENCE. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 32(4). 2.8 indexed citations
Smith, Erin & Ted Baker. (2010). THE LIFE OF FIBERS: TEXTILE COMPETITION THROUGH HUMAN CAPITAL BRICOLAGE (INTERACTIVE PAPER). Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 30(12). 24.
9.
Steffens, Paul, Ted Baker, & Julienne Senyard. (2010). Betting on the underdog : bricolage as an engine of resource advantage. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).4 indexed citations
Gartner, William B. & Ted Baker. (2010). A PLAUSIBLE HISTORY AND EXPLORATION OF STEVENSON’S DEFINITION OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 30(4). 2.18 indexed citations
12.
Senyard, Julienne, Ted Baker, & Per Davidsson. (2009). ENTREPRENEURIAL BRICOLAGE: TOWARDS SYSTEMATIC EMPIRICAL TESTING. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 29(5). 5.97 indexed citations
13.
Baker, Ted, et al.. (2009). TOWARDS AN ALTERNATIVE THEORY OF ENTREPRENEURIAL SUCCESS: INTEGRATING BRICOLAGE, EFFECTUATION AND IMPROVISATION (SUMMARY). Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 29(6). 4.13 indexed citations
Gong, Yan, Ted Baker, & Anne S. Miner. (2009). Organizational Routines and Capabilities in New Ventures. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
16.
Baker, Ted, et al.. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction Through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. SSRN Electronic Journal.99 indexed citations
17.
Baker, Ted, et al.. (2003). Gender and Entrepreneurial Opportunity Evaluation. SSRN Electronic Journal.9 indexed citations
18.
Baker, Ted, et al.. (2003). Making that Which is Old New Again: Entrepreneurial Bricolage. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
19.
Baker, Ted, Anne S. Miner, & Dale T. Eesley. (2003). Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy. 32(2). 255–276.720 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Baker, Ted. (1995). Implementing a Teaching Incentive Program.. Thought & action. 11(2). 23–41.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.