Tasmiha Tarafder
- Marketing top 5%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 5%
- Plant Science
- Food Science
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Parves SultanDavid PearsonJoanna Henryks
- Topics
- Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies (2 papers)Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers)Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper)
- Journals
- Food Quality and PreferenceAcquire (CQUniversity)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaBangladeshJapan
In The Last Decade
Tasmiha Tarafder
4 papers receiving 333 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Marketing 224
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 116
- Plant Science 97
- Food Science 68
- Sociology and Political Science 57
Countries citing papers authored by Tasmiha Tarafder
This map shows the geographic impact of Tasmiha Tarafder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tasmiha Tarafder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tasmiha Tarafder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tasmiha Tarafder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tasmiha Tarafder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tasmiha Tarafder. The network helps show where Tasmiha Tarafder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tasmiha Tarafder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tasmiha Tarafder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tasmiha Tarafder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tasmiha Tarafder. Tasmiha Tarafder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Intention-behaviour gap and perceived behavioural control-behaviour gap in theory of planned behaviour: moderating roles of communication, satisfaction and trust in organic food consumptionbreakdown → | 323 |
| 3 | Reproductive health beliefs and their consequences: A case study on rural indigenous women in Bangladesh | 5 |
| 4 | Critical factors in service quality measurement for private universities: The case of Bangladesh | 12 |
| 5 | A Model for Quality Assessment in Higher Education: Implications for ODL Universities | 9 |
About Tasmiha Tarafder
Tasmiha Tarafder is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Information Systems and Management and Strategy and Management, having authored 5 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (224 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (116 citations) and Applied Psychology (24 citations). Tasmiha Tarafder has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Bangladesh and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Parves Sultan, David Pearson and Joanna Henryks. Their work appears in journals such as Food Quality and Preference and Acquire (CQUniversity).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.