T. Standl

39 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

T. Standl
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 97
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 43
  • Emergency Medicine 55
  • Cell Biology 83
  • Developmental Neuroscience 20
Replace Dennis D. Doblar with:
Dennis D. Doblar United States
Christina Olofsson Sweden
K.‐F. Klotz Germany
Matthias Müller Germany
Han-Jung Chen Taiwan
Shigeo Ohmura Japan
GE Davies United Kingdom
S. Liang Australia
Frederick W. Lombard United States
Shinji Kohro Japan
T. Standl relative to Dennis D. Doblar United States Dennis D. Doblar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Dennis D. Doblar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Standl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Standl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Standl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Standl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Standl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Standl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Standl. The network helps show where T. Standl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Standl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Standl Line = papers co-authored together T. Standl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200351
2 199942
3 200539
4 200525
5 199616
6 200216
7
Histology and ultrastructure of liver and kidney following blood exchange with ultrapurified, polymerised bovine hemoglobin in comparison with hydroxyethyl starch.
199916
8 200513
9 199813
10 199810
11 20089
12 19959
13 20038
14 19998
15 19977
16 19987
17 20046
18 20065
19 20095
20 20065

About T. Standl

T. Standl is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (13 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (9 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (7 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (6 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (2 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (97 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (43 citations), Emergency Medicine (55 citations), Cell Biology (83 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (20 citations). T. Standl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Schulte am Esch, Marc-Alexander Burmeister, M. Freitag, J. Schulte am Esch, Stefan Wilhelm, Kai Schnabel, I. Rundshagen, E.‐P. Horn, A. Gottschalk and A. Gottschalk. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026