Jens Scholz

10.0k total citations
294 papers, 6.5k citations indexed

About

Jens Scholz is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Jens Scholz has authored 294 papers receiving a total of 6.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 83 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 79 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 73 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Jens Scholz's work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (68 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (43 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (41 papers). Jens Scholz is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (68 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (43 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (41 papers). Jens Scholz collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Jens Scholz's co-authors include Berthold Bein, Markus Steinfath, Peter H. Tonner, Patrick Meybohm, Andrea Paris, Jochen Renner, Jochen Schulte am Esch, Volker Dörges, Erwin Prassler and Erol Cavus and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Circulation Research and American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Jens Scholz

278 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Peers

Jens Scholz
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Surgery 2.1k
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1.9k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.8k
  • Emergency Medicine 1.1k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 1.1k
Replace Paul S. Pagel with:
Paul S. Pagel United States
Nathan L. Pace United States
Berthold Bein Germany
Markus Steinfath Germany
Markus W. Hollmann Netherlands
Donald S. Prough United States
Michael S. Avidan United States
E. Kochs Germany
Benedikt Preckel Netherlands
Arvi Yli‐Hankala Finland
Paul S. Pagel United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Jens Scholz
Jens Scholz · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Jens Scholz
Jens Scholz · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Scholz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Scholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Scholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Scholz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Scholz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Scholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Scholz. The network helps show where Jens Scholz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Scholz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Scholz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Scholz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Scholz. Jens Scholz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 19
2 48
3 45
4 5
5 30
6 168
7 2
8 87
9 51
10 0
11 47
12 6
13 66
14 21
15 24
16 157
17 46
18 6
19 18
20 2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026