T. D. Barnes
Impact in
- Classics top 0.02%
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Anthropology top 0.5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
Papers in
- Anthropology 60
- Classical Antiquity Studies 58
- Classics 42
- Byzantine Studies and History 38
- Co-authors
- Dennis E. Groh (1 shared paper)Michael DiMaio (1 shared paper)Richard Lim (1 shared paper)Thomas W. Africa (1 shared paper)David S. Potter (1 shared paper)Robert D. Sider (1 shared paper)Bernard S. Bachrach (1 shared paper)Werner Eck (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Phoenix (28 papers)The Journal of Theological Studies (14 papers)The Journal of Roman Studies (9 papers)The American Historical Review (7 papers)Classical Philology (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
T. D. Barnes
99 papers receiving 573 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Classics 407
- Anthropology 571
- Religious studies 213
- Archeology 419
- History 346
Countries citing papers authored by T. D. Barnes
This map shows the geographic impact of T. D. Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. D. Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. D. Barnes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T. D. Barnes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. D. Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. D. Barnes. The network helps show where T. D. Barnes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside T. D. Barnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1982 | 102 | |
| 2 | 1974 | 51 | |
| 3 | 1968 | 49 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 42 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 37 | |
| 7 | 1973 | 26 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 23 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 23 | |
| 10 | 1980 | 23 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 21 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 19 | |
| 13 | 1973 | 18 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 15 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1968 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 14 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 13 |
About T. D. Barnes
T. D. Barnes is a scholar working on Anthropology, Classics, History, Archeology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 120 papers that have together received 986 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (58 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (38 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (24 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (21 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (17 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (16 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (13 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (407 citations), Anthropology (571 citations), Religious studies (213 citations), Archeology (419 citations) and History (346 citations). T. D. Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Dennis E. Groh, Michael DiMaio, Richard Lim, Thomas W. Africa, David S. Potter, Robert D. Sider, Bernard S. Bachrach, Werner Eck, A. J. Woodman and R. H. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Phoenix, The Journal of Theological Studies, The Journal of Roman Studies, The American Historical Review and Classical Philology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.