Robert D. Sider
Impact in
- Religious studies top 2%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Theology and Canon Law Studies
- Classics top 5%
- Byzantine Studies and History
Papers in
- Classics 8
- Byzantine Studies and History 7
-
- Historical and Linguistic Studies 5
- Co-authors
- James L. Kugel (1 shared paper)Rowan A. Greer (1 shared paper)T. D. Barnes (1 shared paper)Richard Klein (1 shared paper)Desiderius Erasmus (3 shared papers)J. Wetzel (1 shared paper)J. H. Waszink (1 shared paper)J. C. M. van Winden (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Classical World (14 papers)The American Journal of Philology (2 papers)The Journal of Theological Studies (1 paper)Renaissance and Reformation (1 paper)University of Toronto Press eBooks (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Robert D. Sider
16 papers receiving 68 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Religious studies 63
- Classics 38
- Archeology 38
- Anthropology 27
- History 26
Countries citing papers authored by Robert D. Sider
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert D. Sider's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert D. Sider with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert D. Sider more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert D. Sider
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert D. Sider. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert D. Sider. The network helps show where Robert D. Sider may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Robert D. Sider, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ancient rhetoric and the art of Tertullian | 1971 | 26 |
| 2 | 1989 | 20 | |
| 3 | 1973 | 20 | |
| 4 | 1974 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1969 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1980 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1968 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 9 | Christian and Pagan in the Roman Empire : the witness of Tertullian | 2001 | 4 |
| 10 | 1970 | 4 | |
| 11 | Paraphrases on Romans and Galatians | 1984 | 2 |
| 12 | Paraphrase on John | 1991 | 1 |
| 13 | Paraphrase on the Acts of the Apostles | 1995 | 1 |
| 14 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 1 |
About Robert D. Sider
Robert D. Sider is a scholar working on Classics, Sociology and Political Science, History, Religious studies and Philosophy, having authored 23 papers that have together received 122 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (7 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (5 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (4 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (63 citations), Classics (38 citations), Archeology (38 citations), Anthropology (27 citations) and History (26 citations). Frequent co-authors include James L. Kugel, Rowan A. Greer, T. D. Barnes, Richard Klein, Desiderius Erasmus, J. Wetzel, J. H. Waszink, J. C. M. van Winden, Jerry H. Bentley and Albert Rabil. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, The American Journal of Philology, The Journal of Theological Studies, Renaissance and Reformation and University of Toronto Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.