Richard Lim

1.5k citations
30 papers · 565 indexed · h-index 10
Topics
Classical Antiquity Studies (9 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers)Byzantine Studies and History (4 papers)

In The Last Decade

Richard Lim

26 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

Richard Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Sociology and Political Science 127
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 107
  • Biomedical Engineering 101
  • Clinical Psychology 75
  • Anthropology 55
Replace Monica H. Green with:
Monica H. Green United States
James G. Williams United States
John Martin United States
Michael C. Shapiro United States
Patricia Walters United States
Michael Field Australia
Sharon P. Holland United States
Jennifer Ward United Kingdom
Vardit Rispler‐Chaim Israel
Carolyn Moxley Rouse United States
Richard Lim relative to Monica H. Green United States Monica H. Green's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Monica H. Green · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Lim. The network helps show where Richard Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Lim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Lim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Lim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Lim. Richard Lim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 142
3
Palliative care in Malaysia: the need to do much more.
5
4 24
5 3
6 127
7 40
8 30
9
Beating the odds
1
10
ANALISA KORELASI INFLASI, ECONOMIC GROWTH, ECONOMIC STRUCTURE, DAN TAX RATE TERHADAP TAX REVENUE DI NEGARA-NEGARA ASEAN
2
11 20
12 3
13 4
14 2
15 20
16 1
17
Readings in Ancient History
2
18 32
19 1
20 2

About Richard Lim

Richard Lim is a scholar working on Classics, Anthropology and Internal Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (49 citations), Religious studies (32 citations) and Anthropology (55 citations). Richard Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Aggie J. Yellow Horse, Russell Jeung, T. D. Barnes, John Crook, C R Hind, Martin Walshaw, Christopher C. Evans, Neal Patel, James Johnson and Kamfai Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, The American Historical Review and Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026