T. A. Callister

74.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
27 papers, 830 citations indexed

About

T. A. Callister is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, T. A. Callister has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 830 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 6 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 3 papers in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in T. A. Callister's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (24 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (13 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (8 papers). T. A. Callister is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (24 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (13 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (8 papers). T. A. Callister collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. T. A. Callister's co-authors include Will M. Farr, Mathieu Renzo, Katelyn Breivik, Nicholas C. Burbules, S. Vitale, L. A. C. van Son, Kyle Kremer, Ken K. Y. Ng, Simona J. Miller and C.‐J. Haster and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

T. A. Callister

25 papers receiving 731 citations

Hit Papers

The Redshift Evolution of the Binary Black Hole Merger Ra... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 2024 25 50 75 100

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
T. A. Callister United States 15 739 201 43 37 32 27 830
H. M. Johnston Australia 19 740 1.0× 372 1.9× 38 0.9× 16 0.4× 18 0.6× 46 886
Louis J. Rubbo United States 8 276 0.4× 38 0.2× 11 0.3× 39 1.1× 25 0.8× 13 374
Kelly Holley‐Bockelmann United States 21 887 1.2× 131 0.7× 10 0.2× 18 0.5× 31 1.0× 60 953
Ornella Pantano Italy 13 580 0.8× 408 2.0× 5 0.1× 68 1.8× 9 0.3× 27 670
Y. Liu China 11 433 0.6× 287 1.4× 9 0.2× 12 0.3× 33 1.0× 28 485
V. C. de Andrade Brazil 9 512 0.7× 376 1.9× 15 0.3× 43 1.2× 30 0.9× 19 553
Marc Freitag United States 13 1.1k 1.5× 203 1.0× 19 0.4× 28 0.8× 41 1.3× 22 1.2k
T. D. Russell Australia 18 1.0k 1.4× 464 2.3× 111 2.6× 12 0.3× 13 0.4× 80 1.1k
Mauro Mariani Argentina 12 259 0.4× 60 0.3× 92 2.1× 22 0.6× 42 1.3× 30 312
E. Anderson United States 6 235 0.3× 34 0.2× 7 0.2× 12 0.3× 14 0.4× 10 284

Countries citing papers authored by T. A. Callister

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. A. Callister's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. A. Callister with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. A. Callister more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. A. Callister

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. A. Callister. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. A. Callister. The network helps show where T. A. Callister may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. A. Callister

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. A. Callister. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. A. Callister based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. A. Callister. T. A. Callister is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Turbang, K., et al.. (2025). No evidence that the binary black hole mass distribution evolves with redshift. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 698. A85–A85. 5 indexed citations
2.
Antonini, Fabio, I. M. Romero-Shaw, & T. A. Callister. (2025). Star Cluster Population of High Mass Black Hole Mergers in Gravitational Wave Data. Physical Review Letters. 134(1). 11401–11401. 19 indexed citations
3.
Farah, A. M., T. A. Callister, José María Ezquiaga, M. Zevin, & D. E. Holz. (2025). No Need to Know: Toward Astrophysics-free Gravitational-wave Cosmology. The Astrophysical Journal. 978(2). 153–153. 14 indexed citations
4.
Callister, T. A., et al.. (2025). New probe of gravitational parity violation through nonobservation of the stochastic gravitational-wave background. Physical review. D. 111(4). 8 indexed citations
5.
Banagiri, S., et al.. (2025). Structure and Skewness of the Effective Inspiral Spin Distribution of Binary Black Hole Mergers. The Astrophysical Journal. 990(2). 147–147. 1 indexed citations
6.
Antonini, Fabio, et al.. (2025). Inferring the pair-instability mass gap from gravitational wave data. Physical review. D. 112(6).
7.
Callister, T. A. & Will M. Farr. (2024). Parameter-Free Tour of the Binary Black Hole Population. Physical Review X. 14(2). 46 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Callister, T. A., R. C. Essick, & D. E. Holz. (2024). Neural network emulator of the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo selection function. Physical review. D. 110(12). 3 indexed citations
10.
McKernan, Barry, K. E. Saavik Ford, T. A. Callister, et al.. (2022). LIGO–Virgo correlations between mass ratio and effective inspiral spin: testing the active galactic nuclei channel. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 514(3). 3886–3893. 37 indexed citations
11.
Son, L. A. C. van, S. E. de Mink, Mathieu Renzo, et al.. (2022). No Peaks without Valleys: The Stable Mass Transfer Channel for Gravitational-wave Sources in Light of the Neutron Star–Black Hole Mass Gap. The Astrophysical Journal. 940(2). 184–184. 55 indexed citations
12.
Son, L. A. C. van, S. E. de Mink, T. A. Callister, et al.. (2022). The Redshift Evolution of the Binary Black Hole Merger Rate: A Weighty Matter. The Astrophysical Journal. 931(1). 17–17. 115 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Janssens, K., T. A. Callister, N. Christensen, et al.. (2021). . arXiv (Cornell University). 3 indexed citations
14.
Callister, T. A., Will M. Farr, & Mathieu Renzo. (2021). State of the Field: Binary Black Hole Natal Kicks and Prospects for Isolated Field Formation after GWTC-2. The Astrophysical Journal. 920(2). 157–157. 34 indexed citations
15.
Renzo, Mathieu, T. A. Callister, Katerina Chatziioannou, et al.. (2021). Prospects of Gravitational Wave Detections from Common Envelope Evolution with LISA. The Astrophysical Journal. 919(2). 128–128. 18 indexed citations
16.
Callister, T. A., C.‐J. Haster, Ken K. Y. Ng, S. Vitale, & Will M. Farr. (2021). Who Ordered That? Unequal-Mass Binary Black Hole Mergers Have Larger Effective Spins. arXiv (Cornell University). 102 indexed citations
17.
Romero, A., K. Martinovic, T. A. Callister, et al.. (2021). Implications for First-Order Cosmological Phase Transitions from the Third LIGO-Virgo Observing Run. Physical Review Letters. 126(15). 151301–151301. 46 indexed citations
18.
Callister, T. A., M. W. Coughlin, & J. B. Kanner. (2018). Gravitational-wave Geodesy: A New Tool for Validating Detection of the Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 869(2). L28–L28. 5 indexed citations
19.
Callister, T. A., A. S. Biscoveanu, N. Christensen, et al.. (2017). Tests of General Relativity with the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
20.
Callister, T. A., J. B. Kanner, T. J. Massinger, S. Dhurandhar, & A. J. Weinstein. (2017). Observing gravitational waves with a single detector. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 34(15). 155007–155007. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026