C.‐J. Haster

74.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
39 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

C.‐J. Haster is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, C.‐J. Haster has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10 papers in Oceanography and 10 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in C.‐J. Haster's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (39 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (21 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (15 papers). C.‐J. Haster is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (39 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (21 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (15 papers). C.‐J. Haster collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. C.‐J. Haster's co-authors include Carl L. Rodriguez, Katerina Chatziioannou, M. Pürrer, S. Vitale, Frederic A. Rasio, Sourav Chatterjee, Aaron Zimmerman, Meagan Morscher, Bharath Pattabiraman and E. Ramírez-Ruiz and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

C.‐J. Haster

36 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Binary Black Hole Mergers from Globular Clusters: Implica... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C.‐J. Haster United States 24 1.8k 295 271 237 83 39 1.9k
Shubhanshu Tiwari Switzerland 15 1.5k 0.8× 291 1.0× 319 1.2× 180 0.8× 101 1.2× 31 1.6k
S. Babak France 20 1.9k 1.1× 221 0.7× 482 1.8× 220 0.9× 110 1.3× 37 2.0k
M. Bejger Poland 20 1.4k 0.8× 492 1.7× 377 1.4× 287 1.2× 151 1.8× 63 1.5k
G. Pratten United Kingdom 23 2.1k 1.2× 392 1.3× 421 1.6× 292 1.2× 75 0.9× 52 2.2k
Tejaswi Venumadhav United States 18 1.3k 0.7× 188 0.6× 319 1.2× 133 0.6× 69 0.8× 36 1.4k
B. Farr United States 19 1.3k 0.7× 210 0.7× 200 0.7× 181 0.8× 69 0.8× 34 1.3k
S. Abraham United States 5 960 0.5× 164 0.6× 221 0.8× 114 0.5× 73 0.9× 5 1.0k
Davide Gerosa United Kingdom 33 2.8k 1.5× 270 0.9× 597 2.2× 153 0.6× 67 0.8× 98 2.9k
C. Talbot United States 20 1.2k 0.6× 157 0.5× 232 0.9× 174 0.7× 75 0.9× 34 1.2k
C. P. L. Berry United Kingdom 24 2.4k 1.3× 177 0.6× 686 2.5× 211 0.9× 129 1.6× 48 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by C.‐J. Haster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.‐J. Haster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.‐J. Haster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.‐J. Haster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.‐J. Haster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.‐J. Haster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.‐J. Haster. The network helps show where C.‐J. Haster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.‐J. Haster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.‐J. Haster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.‐J. Haster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.‐J. Haster. C.‐J. Haster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Huang, Y., Hsin-Yu Chen, C.‐J. Haster, et al.. (2025). Impact of calibration uncertainties on Hubble constant measurements from gravitational-wave sources. Physical review. D. 111(6). 3 indexed citations
2.
Mo, Geoffrey, C.‐J. Haster, & E. Katsavounidis. (2025). On the Use of Galaxy Catalogs in Gravitational-wave Parameter Estimation. The Astrophysical Journal. 979(2). 102–102. 1 indexed citations
3.
Haster, C.‐J., et al.. (2023). Waveform accuracy and systematic uncertainties in current gravitational wave observations. Physical review. D. 108(4). 28 indexed citations
4.
Yoo, J., Vijay Varma, Matthew Giesler, et al.. (2022). Targeted large mass ratio numerical relativity surrogate waveform model for GW190814. Physical review. D. 106(4). 25 indexed citations
5.
Vitale, S., C.‐J. Haster, L. Sun, et al.. (2021). Physical approach to the marginalization of LIGO calibration uncertainties. Physical review. D. 103(6). 24 indexed citations
6.
Callister, T. A., C.‐J. Haster, Ken K. Y. Ng, S. Vitale, & Will M. Farr. (2021). Who Ordered That? Unequal-Mass Binary Black Hole Mergers Have Larger Effective Spins. arXiv (Cornell University). 102 indexed citations
7.
Huang, Y., C.‐J. Haster, S. Vitale, et al.. (2021). Statistical and systematic uncertainties in extracting the source properties of neutron star-black hole binaries with gravitational waves. Physical review. D. 103(8). 13 indexed citations
8.
Huang, Y., C.‐J. Haster, Javier Roulet, et al.. (2020). Source properties of the lowest signal-to-noise-ratio binary black hole detections. Physical review. D. 102(10). 16 indexed citations
9.
Haster, C.‐J., Katerina Chatziioannou, Andreas Bauswein, & J. A. Clark. (2020). Inference of the Neutron Star Equation of State from Cosmological Distances. Physical Review Letters. 125(26). 261101–261101. 15 indexed citations
10.
Pürrer, M. & C.‐J. Haster. (2020). Gravitational waveform accuracy requirements for future ground-based detectors. Physical Review Research. 2(2). 145 indexed citations
11.
Vigna-Gómez, Alejandro, Silvia Toonen, E. Ramírez-Ruiz, et al.. (2020). Massive Stellar Triples Leading to Sequential Binary Black-Hole Mergers in the Field. arXiv (Cornell University). 51 indexed citations
12.
Biscoveanu, S., C.‐J. Haster, S. Vitale, & J. E. Davies. (2020). Quantifying the effect of power spectral density uncertainty on gravitational-wave parameter estimation for compact binary sources. Physical review. D. 102(2). 26 indexed citations
13.
Huang, Y.-J., et al.. (2020). Statistical and systematic uncertainties in extracting the source properties of neutron star - black hole binaries with gravitational waves. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 53(1). 1 indexed citations
14.
Ng, Ken K. Y., M. Isi, C.‐J. Haster, & S. Vitale. (2020). Multiband gravitational-wave searches for ultralight bosons. Physical review. D. 102(8). 31 indexed citations
15.
Zevin, M., Johan Samsing, Carl L. Rodriguez, C.‐J. Haster, & E. Ramírez-Ruiz. (2019). Eccentric Black Hole Mergers in Dense Star Clusters: The Role of Binary–Binary Encounters. The Astrophysical Journal. 871(1). 91–91. 171 indexed citations
17.
Ng, Ken K. Y., S. Vitale, Aaron Zimmerman, et al.. (2018). Gravitational-wave astrophysics with effective-spin measurements: Asymmetries and selection biases. Physical review. D. 98(8). 82 indexed citations
18.
Pankow, C., Katerina Chatziioannou, E. A. Chase, et al.. (2018). Mitigation of the instrumental noise transient in gravitational-wave data surrounding GW170817. Physical Review Letters.
19.
Vitale, S., Davide Gerosa, C.‐J. Haster, Katerina Chatziioannou, & Aaron Zimmerman. (2017). Impact of Bayesian Priors on the Characterization of Binary Black Hole Coalescences. Physical Review Letters. 119(25). 251103–251103. 48 indexed citations
20.
Rodriguez, Carl L., Meagan Morscher, Bharath Pattabiraman, et al.. (2015). Binary Black Hole Mergers from Globular Clusters: Implications for Advanced LIGO. Physical Review Letters. 115(5). 51101–51101. 290 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026