T. J. Massinger

80.1k total citations
10 papers, 126 citations indexed

About

T. J. Massinger is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, T. J. Massinger has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 126 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2 papers in Oceanography and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in T. J. Massinger's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (5 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (2 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers). T. J. Massinger is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (5 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (2 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers). T. J. Massinger collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. T. J. Massinger's co-authors include D. M. Macleod, J. S. Areeda, S. B. Coughlin, Alexander Urban, J. B. Kanner, S. Vitale, S. Dhurandhar, A. J. Weinstein, T. A. Callister and R. J. E. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Physical review. D and Classical and Quantum Gravity.

In The Last Decade

T. J. Massinger

9 papers receiving 121 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
T. J. Massinger United States	5	120	41	18	15	10	10	126
T. Adams France	3	147 1.2×	43 1.0×	27 1.5×	16 1.1×	21 2.1×	4	152
K. Wiesner Germany	2	116 1.0×	24 0.6×	14 0.8×	13 0.9×	9 0.9×	2	123
D. M. Macleod United Kingdom	7	154 1.3×	58 1.4×	28 1.6×	20 1.3×	17 1.7×	13	165
V. Necula United States	4	80 0.7×	34 0.8×	16 0.9×	8 0.5×	15 1.5×	5	89
F. Di Renzo Italy	3	77 0.6×	32 0.8×	19 1.1×	6 0.4×	7 0.7×	9	82
S. D. Reyes Germany	3	219 1.8×	60 1.5×	29 1.6×	14 0.9×	32 3.2×	5	229
Qi Chu Australia	7	133 1.1×	29 0.7×	23 1.3×	14 0.9×	22 2.2×	10	155
B. U. Gadre United States	7	116 1.0×	31 0.8×	21 1.2×	6 0.4×	11 1.1×	9	119
Sarah Caudill Netherlands	8	135 1.1×	30 0.7×	18 1.0×	33 2.2×	13 1.3×	14	150
F. Morawski Poland	6	85 0.7×	24 0.6×	28 1.6×	12 0.8×	22 2.2×	8	101

Countries citing papers authored by T. J. Massinger

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. J. Massinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. J. Massinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. J. Massinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. J. Massinger

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. J. Massinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. J. Massinger. The network helps show where T. J. Massinger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. J. Massinger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. J. Massinger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. J. Massinger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. J. Massinger. T. J. Massinger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Vajpeyi, A., R. J. E. Smith, E. Thrane, et al.. (2022). A follow-up on intermediate-mass black hole candidates in the second LIGO–Virgo observing run with the Bayes Coherence Ratio. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 516(4). 5309–5317. 2 indexed citations

2.

Macleod, D. M., A. L. Urban, S. B. Coughlin, et al.. (2021). gwpy/gwpy: 2.0.4. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

3.

Macleod, D. M., J. S. Areeda, S. B. Coughlin, T. J. Massinger, & Alexander Urban. (2021). GWpy: A Python package for gravitational-wave astrophysics. SoftwareX. 13. 100657–100657. 41 indexed citations

4.

Macleod, D. M., A. L. Urban, S. B. Coughlin, et al.. (2020). gwpy/gwpy: 2.0.2. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations

5.

Macleod, D. M., A. L. Urban, S. B. Coughlin, et al.. (2020). gwpy/gwpy: 1.0.1. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 6 indexed citations

6.

Macleod, D. M., A. L. Urban, S. B. Coughlin, et al.. (2019). GWpy: Python package for studying data from gravitational-wave detectors. ascl. 3 indexed citations

7.

Urban, A. L., S. B. Coughlin, T. J. Massinger, et al.. (2019). gwpy/gwpy: 1.0.0. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations

8.

Isi, M., R. J. E. Smith, S. Vitale, et al.. (2018). Enhancing confidence in the detection of gravitational waves from compact binaries using signal coherence. Physical review. D. 98(4). 18 indexed citations

9.

Callister, T. A., J. B. Kanner, T. J. Massinger, S. Dhurandhar, & A. J. Weinstein. (2017). Observing gravitational waves with a single detector. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 34(15). 155007–155007. 13 indexed citations

10.

Nuttall, L. K., T. J. Massinger, J. S. Areeda, et al.. (2015). Improving the data quality of Advanced LIGO based on early engineering run results. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 32(24). 245005–245005. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact