Countries citing papers authored by Sydney Meshkov
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sydney Meshkov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sydney Meshkov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sydney Meshkov more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sydney Meshkov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sydney Meshkov. The network helps show where Sydney Meshkov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sydney Meshkov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sydney Meshkov.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sydney Meshkov based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sydney Meshkov. Sydney Meshkov is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Meshkov, Sydney. (2009). The symmetries of nature. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 196. 12007–12007.1 indexed citations
Meshkov, Sydney. (2000). Gravitational waves : third Edoardo Amaldi conference, Pasadena, California 12-16 July 1999. American Institute of Physics eBooks.3 indexed citations
4.
Fridman, A. & Sydney Meshkov. (1991). Total cross sections of bottom and charmed mesons on protons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 44(7). R1903–R1904.1 indexed citations
5.
Meshkov, Sydney. (1989). Моделирование методом Монте-Карло в статистической физике. Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk. 159(9). 187–188.1 indexed citations
6.
Kaus, Peter & Sydney Meshkov. (1989). ERRATA: A BCS QUARK MASS MATRIX. Modern Physics Letters A. 4(6). 603–604.18 indexed citations
7.
Kaus, Peter & Sydney Meshkov. (1989). BCS Mass Matricesa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 578(1). 353–361.3 indexed citations
8.
Kaus, Peter & Sydney Meshkov. (1988). A BCS QUARK MASS MATRIX. Modern Physics Letters A. 3(13). 1251–1259.72 indexed citations
Fishbane, Paul M., Peter Kaus, & Sydney Meshkov. (1986). Do heavy quarkonia have stringlike behavior?. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 33(3). 852–855.4 indexed citations
11.
Carlson, Carl E., J. Coyne, Paul M. Fishbane, Franz Gross, & Sydney Meshkov. (1981). Glueballs: Their experimental signature. Physics Letters B. 99(4). 353–357.46 indexed citations
12.
Carlson, Carl E., J. Coyne, Paul M. Fishbane, Franz Gross, & Sydney Meshkov. (1981). E(1440): Glueball or quarkonium?. Physics Letters B. 98(1-2). 110–114.34 indexed citations
Fishbane, Paul M., D. Horn, & Sydney Meshkov. (1979). Spin forces in charmonium spectroscopy. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 19(1). 288–290.6 indexed citations
16.
Meshkov, Sydney & S. P. Rosen. (1974). Gauge theories andM-spin conservation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 10(10). 3520–3521.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.