Peter C. McNamee

1.0k total citations
21 papers, 758 citations indexed

About

Peter C. McNamee is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter C. McNamee has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 758 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in Peter C. McNamee's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (16 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (16 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (4 papers). Peter C. McNamee is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (16 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (16 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (4 papers). Peter C. McNamee collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Switzerland. Peter C. McNamee's co-authors include M. D. Scadron, S. A. Coon, Bruce H. J. McKellar, D. W. E. Blatt, B. R. Barrett, Frank Chilton, John F. Gunion, R. J. Oakes, N. G. Deshpande and Jogesh C. Pati and has published in prestigious journals such as Reviews of Modern Physics, Nuclear Physics B and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

Peter C. McNamee

21 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter C. McNamee United States 9 687 219 90 36 32 21 758
D. Kiełczewska Poland 12 649 0.9× 160 0.7× 80 0.9× 39 1.1× 22 0.7× 20 681
H. Kanada Japan 15 735 1.1× 491 2.2× 101 1.1× 52 1.4× 21 0.7× 61 810
Hironari Miyazawa Japan 9 606 0.9× 260 1.2× 90 1.0× 38 1.1× 67 2.1× 32 698
G. H. Lamot France 13 594 0.9× 164 0.7× 69 0.8× 55 1.5× 25 0.8× 35 653
H.H. Hackenbroich Germany 14 477 0.7× 379 1.7× 71 0.8× 77 2.1× 19 0.6× 28 549
A. Montwill United Kingdom 14 722 1.1× 186 0.8× 71 0.8× 37 1.0× 49 1.5× 24 782
C. Fayard France 13 647 0.9× 182 0.8× 75 0.8× 58 1.6× 25 0.8× 45 715
J.M. Soper United Kingdom 10 505 0.7× 238 1.1× 111 1.2× 80 2.2× 42 1.3× 14 565
I. R. Afnan Australia 18 784 1.1× 261 1.2× 81 0.9× 21 0.6× 23 0.7× 41 877
J. Niewisch Germany 9 602 0.9× 176 0.8× 84 0.9× 39 1.1× 60 1.9× 16 664

Countries citing papers authored by Peter C. McNamee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter C. McNamee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter C. McNamee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter C. McNamee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter C. McNamee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter C. McNamee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter C. McNamee. The network helps show where Peter C. McNamee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter C. McNamee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter C. McNamee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter C. McNamee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter C. McNamee. Peter C. McNamee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Coon, S. A. & Peter C. McNamee. (1979). Particle mixing and charge asymmetric ΛN forces. Nuclear Physics A. 322(2-3). 267–284. 11 indexed citations
2.
Coon, S. A., M. D. Scadron, Peter C. McNamee, et al.. (1979). The two-pion-exchange three-nucleon potential and nuclear matter. Nuclear Physics A. 317(1). 242–278. 333 indexed citations
3.
Coon, S. A., M. D. Scadron, & Peter C. McNamee. (1977). On the sign of the ρ-ω mixing charge asymmetric nn potential. Nuclear Physics A. 287(3). 381–389. 67 indexed citations
4.
Fishbane, Paul M., Peter C. McNamee, & J. V. Noble. (1977). Total cross sections of nucleon diffractive excitations. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 16(7). 2386–2389. 2 indexed citations
5.
Gunion, John F., Peter C. McNamee, & M. D. Scadron. (1977). Chiral symmetry breaking and the quark model: Unification of baryon and meson constraints. Nuclear Physics B. 123(3). 445–492. 55 indexed citations
6.
Gunion, John F., Peter C. McNamee, & M. D. Scadron. (1976). Chiral symmetry breaking and the quark model. Physics Letters B. 63(1). 81–85. 32 indexed citations
7.
McNamee, Peter C. & M. D. Scadron. (1976). Difficulties with a quantum chromodynamic formulation of non-leptonic decays. Physics Letters B. 63(2). 188–190. 5 indexed citations
8.
McNamee, Peter C., et al.. (1975). Particle mixing and charge asymmetric nuclear forces. Nuclear Physics A. 249(3). 483–492. 73 indexed citations
9.
McNamee, Peter C. & M. D. Scadron. (1975). Current algebra and the η3π decaydecay. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 30(2). 287–319. 8 indexed citations
10.
McNamee, Peter C. & M. D. Scadron. (1975). Comment on theη3πpuzzle in the (3,3¯) model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 11(1). 226–229. 6 indexed citations
11.
McNamee, Peter C. & M. D. Scadron. (1974). Kaon nonleptonic decays and chiral-symmetry breaking. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 10(7). 2280–2297. 11 indexed citations
12.
McNamee, Peter C.. (1974). Some implications of a spin-0W-meson theory of the weak interactions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 9(1). 275–287. 1 indexed citations
13.
Deshpande, N. G. & Peter C. McNamee. (1972). Some Difficulties with the Use of the Kemmer-Duffin Formalism for Pseudoscalar Mesons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 5(4). 1012–1014. 7 indexed citations
14.
Deshpande, N. G. & Peter C. McNamee. (1972). Spin-Zero Intermediate Boson for Weak Interactions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 5(6). 1389–1397. 3 indexed citations
15.
McNamee, Peter C. & Jogesh C. Pati. (1969). Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron in theVAeiφTheory of Weak Interactions. Physical Review. 178(5). 2273–2277. 7 indexed citations
16.
Fearing, Harold W., Peter C. McNamee, & R. J. Oakes. (1969). Weak electron scattering: e−+p→Λ+v. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 60(1). 10–24. 4 indexed citations
17.
McNamee, Peter C.. (1968). Kl5Form Factors from Partially Conserved Axial-Vector Current and Current Algebra. Physical Review. 168(5). 1683–1691. 4 indexed citations
18.
McNamee, Peter C. & R. J. Oakes. (1967). Kl5 form factors from PCAC and current algebra. Physics Letters B. 24(12). 629–633. 3 indexed citations
19.
McNamee, Peter C. & R. J. Oakes. (1966). Leptonic Decay of the HyperfragmentH4Λ. Physical Review. 149(4). 1157–1163. 4 indexed citations
20.
McNamee, Peter C., et al.. (1964). Tables of Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients of SU3. Reviews of Modern Physics. 36(4). 1005–1024. 121 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026