Replace International Journal of Modern Physics A with:
International Journal of Modern Physics AUnited States
The European Physical Journal CGermany
Progress of Theoretical Physics SupplementJapan
International Journal of Theoretical PhysicsChina
Progress of Theoretical PhysicsJapan
Classical and Quantum GravityUnited States
The European Physical Journal PlusChina
General Relativity and GravitationUnited States
Communications in Theoretical PhysicsChina
Journal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalUnited States
International Journal of Modern Physics AUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Modern Physics Letters A
Modern Physics Letters A · 1×
×1.154.7kNHEP
×0.925.5kAA
×1.123.1kSNP
×1.114.6kAMPO
×1.610.2kGT
Citations per year, relative to Modern Physics Letters A
Modern Physics Letters A · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Modern Physics Letters A
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern Physics Letters A. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern Physics Letters A with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Physics Letters A more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Modern Physics Letters A
This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern Physics Letters A. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern Physics Letters A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.