Susheila Nasta
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- History top 10%
- Co-authors
- Bruce KingKenneth RamchandAnna RutherfordRobert FraserRuvani RanasinhaElleke BoehmerCarole Boyce DaviesLizabeth Paravisini-Gebert
- Topics
- Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies (4 papers)Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (4 papers)Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Susheila Nasta
18 papers receiving 113 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Literature and Literary Theory 104
- Sociology and Political Science 64
- Anthropology 42
- Cultural Studies 35
- History 22
Countries citing papers authored by Susheila Nasta
This map shows the geographic impact of Susheila Nasta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susheila Nasta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susheila Nasta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Susheila Nasta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susheila Nasta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susheila Nasta. The network helps show where Susheila Nasta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susheila Nasta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susheila Nasta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susheila Nasta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susheila Nasta. Susheila Nasta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | India in Britain: South Asian Networks and Connections, 1858-1950 | 1 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | The Lonely Londoners by Sam Selvon | 1 |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | La reinvención de Gran Bretaña | 0 |
| 14 | Reading the New Literatures in a Postcolonial Era | 21 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Motherlands: Black Women's Writing from the Caribbean, Africa and South Asia | 7 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | Foreday Morning: Selected Prose 1946-1986 | 5 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Susheila Nasta
Susheila Nasta is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies and Religious studies, having authored 24 papers that have together received 171 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies (4 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (4 papers) and Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (104 citations), Anthropology (42 citations) and Cultural Studies (35 citations). Susheila Nasta has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bruce King, Kenneth Ramchand, Anna Rutherford, Robert Fraser, Ruvani Ranasinha, Elleke Boehmer, Carole Boyce Davies, Lizabeth Paravisini-Gebert and Selwyn R. Cudjoe. Their work appears in journals such as Feminist Studies, World Literature Today and Women a Cultural Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.