Mabel Moraña
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 5%
- Religious studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Antonio Cornejo PolarBret GustafsonAlberto BlasiFrancisco Leonardo Torres‐LealJavier CamposIgnacio M. Sánchez Prado
- Topics
- Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (7 papers)Latin American Literature Studies (6 papers)Literary and Cultural Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaHispaniaHispanic Review
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Mabel Moraña
36 papers receiving 88 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Literature and Literary Theory 77
- Cultural Studies 55
- Sociology and Political Science 36
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 32
- Religious studies 30
Countries citing papers authored by Mabel Moraña
This map shows the geographic impact of Mabel Moraña's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mabel Moraña with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mabel Moraña more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mabel Moraña
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mabel Moraña. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mabel Moraña. The network helps show where Mabel Moraña may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mabel Moraña
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mabel Moraña. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mabel Moraña based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mabel Moraña. Mabel Moraña is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | Heridas abiertas : biopolítica y representación en América Latina | 1 |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | Latin American Cultural Studies: When, Where, Why? | 1 |
| 8 | Identity and Nation: more of the same? | 1 |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | El boom del subalterno | 9 |
| 14 | Indigenismo hacia el fin del milenio : homenaje a Antonio Cornejo-Polar | 3 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Mabel Moraña
Mabel Moraña is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies and Museology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 168 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (7 papers), Latin American Literature Studies (6 papers) and Literary and Cultural Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (77 citations), Cultural Studies (55 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (32 citations). Mabel Moraña has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Cornejo Polar, Bret Gustafson, Alberto Blasi, Francisco Leonardo Torres‐Leal, Javier Campos and Ignacio M. Sánchez Prado. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Hispania and Hispanic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.