Susanne Wolff

547 total citations
13 papers, 372 citations indexed

About

Susanne Wolff is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Literature and Literary Theory and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Susanne Wolff has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 372 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 3 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 3 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Susanne Wolff's work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (7 papers), Topic Modeling (4 papers) and Lexicography and Language Studies (3 papers). Susanne Wolff is often cited by papers focused on Natural Language Processing Techniques (7 papers), Topic Modeling (4 papers) and Lexicography and Language Studies (3 papers). Susanne Wolff collaborates with scholars based in United States. Susanne Wolff's co-authors include Jill Burstein, Chi Lu, Martin Chodorow, Karen Kukich, Thomas Quinlan, Derrick Higgins, John B. Thomas, Thomas R. Williams, Bruce Kaplan and James J. Nolan and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Methods of Information in Medicine and ETS Research Report Series.

In The Last Decade

Susanne Wolff

13 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers

Susanne Wolff

AI

IS

EDUCA

DEP

LLT

Isaac Persing United States

Elias C. Stavropoulos Greece

Soyoung Park South Korea

Alexandre Klementiev United States

Mahiéddine Djoudi Algeria

Madeleine Bates United States

Seibu Mary Jacob Malaysia

Marko Rosić Croatia

Gurpreet Singh Josan India

Isaac Persing United States

Susanne Wolff

370 ×1.5

AI

215 ×2.0

IS

26 ×0.4

EDUCA

10 ×0.2

DEP

6 ×0.2

LLT

Citations per year, relative to Susanne Wolff Susanne Wolff (= 1×) peers Isaac Persing

Countries citing papers authored by Susanne Wolff

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susanne Wolff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susanne Wolff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susanne Wolff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susanne Wolff

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susanne Wolff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susanne Wolff. The network helps show where Susanne Wolff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susanne Wolff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susanne Wolff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susanne Wolff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susanne Wolff. Susanne Wolff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Cahill, Aoife, Martin Chodorow, Susanne Wolff, & Nitin Madnani. (2013). Detecting Missing Hyphens in Learner Text. 300–305. 4 indexed citations

2.

Quinlan, Thomas, Derrick Higgins, & Susanne Wolff. (2009). Evaluating the Construct-Coverage of the e-rater[R] Scoring Engine. Research Report. ETS RR-09-01.. 21 indexed citations

3.

Quinlan, Thomas, Derrick Higgins, & Susanne Wolff. (2009). EVALUATING THE CONSTRUCT‐COVERAGE OF THE E‐RATER® SCORING ENGINE. ETS Research Report Series. 2009(1). 41 indexed citations

4.

Burstein, Jill, Martin Chodorow, Bruce Kaplan, et al.. (1998). COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF ESSAY CONTENT FOR AUTOMATED SCORE PREDICTION: A PROTOTYPE AUTOMATED SCORING SYSTEM FOR GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT ESSAYS. ETS Research Report Series. 1998(1). 52 indexed citations

5.

Burstein, Jill, et al.. (1998). Automated scoring using a hybrid feature identification technique. 1. 206–206. 107 indexed citations

6.

Wolff, Susanne, et al.. (1998). SCORING ESSAYS AUTOMATICALLY USING SURFACE FEATURES. ETS Research Report Series. 1998(2). 15 indexed citations

7.

Burstein, Jill, Karen Kukich, Susanne Wolff, Chi Lu, & Martin Chodorow. (1998). Enriching Automated Essay Scoring Using Discourse Marking.. 52 indexed citations

8.

Burstein, Jill, et al.. (1997). An automatic scoring system for advanced placement biology essays. 174–181. 2 indexed citations

9.

Burstein, Jill, et al.. (1995). EVALUATING A PROTOTYPE ESSAY SCORING PROCEDURE USING OFF‐THE‐SHELF SOFTWARE. ETS Research Report Series. 1995(1). 2 indexed citations

10.

Grishman, Ralph, Catherine Macleod, & Susanne Wolff. (1993). The COMLEX Syntax Project. 300–300. 7 indexed citations

11.

Wolff, Susanne. (1984). Lexical entries and word formation. Americanae (AECID Library). 3 indexed citations

12.

Wolff, Susanne. (1984). The Use of Morphosemantic Regularities in the Medical Vocabulary for Automatic Lexical Coding. Methods of Information in Medicine. 23(4). 195–203. 18 indexed citations

13.

Wolff, Susanne, John B. Thomas, & Thomas R. Williams. (1962). The polarity-coincidence correlator: A nonparametric detection device. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 8(1). 5–9. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact