Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Epidemiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Adults in the Community in England
2011643 citationsTraolach Brugha, Sally McManus et al.Archives of General Psychiatryprofile →
Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours
2001629 citationsMargaret Johnson, Catherine H Mercer et al.The Lancetprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Purdon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Purdon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Purdon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Purdon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Purdon. The network helps show where Susan Purdon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan Purdon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan Purdon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan Purdon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Susan Purdon. Susan Purdon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Purdon, Susan, Anne Barlow, Tamsin Ford, et al.. (2017). Understanding the lives of separating and separated families in the UK: what evidence do we need. Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln).2 indexed citations
3.
Purdon, Susan, et al.. (2016). Evaluation of the Troubled Families Programme:Technical report: impact evaluation using survey data.2 indexed citations
4.
Lindsay, Geoff, Mairi Ann Cullen, Vasiliki Totsika, et al.. (2014). CANparent trial evaluation: Final report.. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).4 indexed citations
Cullen, Mairi Ann, et al.. (2013). CANparent Trial Evaluation: First Interim Report. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).4 indexed citations
7.
Trinder, Liz, et al.. (2011). The separated Parent information programme: current effectiveness. The Family in Law. 41(9). 998–1002.1 indexed citations
8.
Brugha, Traolach, Sally McManus, John Bankart, et al.. (2011). Epidemiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Adults in the Community in England. Archives of General Psychiatry. 68(5). 459–459.643 indexed citations breakdown →
Jessiman, Patricia, et al.. (2010). Process evaluation of Workforce Development and Parent Participation in the Disabled Children’s Access to Childcare (DCATCH) Pilots.. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).3 indexed citations
11.
Nicholls, Carol McNaughton, et al.. (2010). Examining implementation of the stable and acute dynamic risk assessment tool pilot in England and Wales.9 indexed citations
12.
Purdon, Susan, et al.. (2010). Aiming high for young people: evaluation feasibility study: final report. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London).1 indexed citations
Brugha, Traolach, Howard Meltzer, Jane Smith, et al.. (2009). Autism spectrum disorders in adults living in households throughout England: Report from the adult psychiatric morbidity survey 2007. Research Portal (King's College London).73 indexed citations
15.
Becker, E. Lovell, et al.. (2009). Evaluation of the National Healthy Schools Programme Interim Report.5 indexed citations
16.
Johnson, Margaret, Catherine H Mercer, Bob Erens, et al.. (2001). Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours. The Lancet. 358(9296). 1835–1842.629 indexed citations breakdown →
Sturgis, Patrick, et al.. (2001). Comparative review and assessment of key health state measures of the general population. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).30 indexed citations
19.
Purdon, Susan, Pamela Campanelli, & Patrick Sturgis. (1999). Interviewer's calling strategies on face-to-face interview surveys. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).11 indexed citations
20.
Mohr, Erich, Pim Brouwers, Jules J. Claus, et al.. (1995). Differential classification of dementia.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(1). 23–30.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.