Jane Smith
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Family and Disability Support Research
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Papers in
-
- Family and Disability Support Research 2
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 3
- Co-authors
- Traolach Brugha (8 shared papers)John Bankart (5 shared papers)Fiona Scott (4 shared papers)Sally McManus (3 shared papers)Howard Meltzer (4 shared papers)Susan Purdon (3 shared papers)Paul Bebbington (1 shared paper)Rachel Jenkins (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (3 papers)Psychological Medicine (2 papers)BJGP Open (1 paper)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)Archives of General Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyQatar
In The Last Decade
Jane Smith
9 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Jane Smith's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Cognitive Neuroscience 855
- Clinical Psychology 516
- Psychiatry and Mental health 308
- Genetics 279
- Speech and Hearing 46
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Smith. The network helps show where Jane Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Epidemiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Adults in the Community in England Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 643 |
| 2 | 2016 | 191 | |
| 3 | Autism spectrum disorders in adults living in households throughout England: Report from the adult psychiatric morbidity survey 2007 | 2009 | 73 |
| 4 | 2011 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 52 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 3 |
About Jane Smith
Jane Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health, Epidemiology and Genetics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (855 citations), Clinical Psychology (516 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (308 citations), Genetics (279 citations) and Speech and Hearing (46 citations). Jane Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Traolach Brugha, John Bankart, Fiona Scott, Sally McManus, Howard Meltzer, Susan Purdon, Paul Bebbington, Rachel Jenkins, Freya Tyrer and Sally‐Ann Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Psychological Medicine, BJGP Open, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Archives of General Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.