Susan B. Parker
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Oncology top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephen J. ElledgeJ. Wade HarperRoderick T. BronsonPiotr SicińskiHumphrey GardnerRobert A. WeinbergJoana Liu DonaherAlan Rawls
- Topics
- Connexins and lens biology (6 papers)Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (3 papers)Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Susan B. Parker
17 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Molecular Biology 2.2k
- Oncology 1.4k
- Genetics 417
- Cell Biology 412
- Cancer Research 286
Countries citing papers authored by Susan B. Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Susan B. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan B. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan B. Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Susan B. Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan B. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan B. Parker. The network helps show where Susan B. Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan B. Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan B. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan B. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan B. Parker. Susan B. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rehabilitacja jako strategia narodowa: urzeczywistnienie praw | 1 |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | Cyclin D2 is an FSH-responsive gene involved in gonadal cell proliferation and oncogenesisbreakdown → | 593 |
| 5 | 410 | |
| 6 | Cyclin D1 provides a link between development and oncogenesis in the retina and breastbreakdown → | 874 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | p53-Independent Expression of p21 Cip1 in Muscle and Other Terminally Differentiating Cellsbreakdown → | 925 |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 41 |
About Susan B. Parker
Susan B. Parker is a scholar working on Immunology and Allergy, Molecular Biology and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 17 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Connexins and lens biology (6 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (3 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.4k citations), Molecular Biology (2.2k citations) and Cell Biology (412 citations). Susan B. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Elledge, J. Wade Harper, Roderick T. Bronson, Piotr Siciński, Humphrey Gardner, Robert A. Weinberg, Joana Liu Donaher, Alan Rawls, Gregor Eichele and Allan Bradley. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.