Stewart Bates

4.3k citations
18 papers · 3.0k indexed · h-index 16

Stewart Bates

18 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Stewart Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Oncology 2.2k
  • Biotechnology 500
  • Molecular Biology 2.2k
  • Cancer Research 438
  • Cell Biology 359
Replace Andrew C. Phillips with:
Andrew C. Phillips United States
Anne M. Theodoras United States
Barbara A. Osborne United States
Elisheva Yonish-Rouach France
Rebecca Haffner Israel
Qimin Zhan United States
Daniele Bergamaschi United Kingdom
Gareth L. Bond United Kingdom
Dalia Resnitzky Israel
Carl G. Maki United States
Stewart Bates relative to Andrew C. Phillips United States Andrew C. Phillips's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Andrew C. Phillips · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stewart Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stewart Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stewart Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stewart Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stewart Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stewart Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stewart Bates. The network helps show where Stewart Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stewart Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stewart Bates Line = papers co-authored together Stewart Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1999204
2 1999261
3 1999186
4 199914
5 1998149
6 1997237
7 199789
8 199742
9
Regulation and function of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16CDKN2.
19973
10 1996228
11 1996306
12 1996259
13 199593
14
Evidence for different modes of action of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors: p15 and p16 bind to kinases, p21 and p27 bind to cyclins.
1995155
15 1995313
16
Absence of cyclin D/cdk complexes in cells lacking functional retinoblastoma protein.
1994162
17
CDK6 (PLSTIRE) and CDK4 (PSK-J3) are a distinct subset of the cyclin-dependent kinases that associate with cyclin D1.
1994229
18 198423

About Stewart Bates

Stewart Bates is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Oncology and Ophthalmology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (16 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (7 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (3 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers), Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (2 papers) and CAR-T cell therapy research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (2.2k citations), Biotechnology (500 citations) and Molecular Biology (2.2k citations). Stewart Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Karen H. Vousden, Godefridus J. Peters, David Parry, Andrew C. Phillips, Kevin M. Ryan, David J. Mann, Robert L. Ludwig, Éva Bálint, Laura Bonetta and Clive Dickson. Their work appears in journals such as Oncogene, The EMBO Journal, Genes & Development, Molecular Carcinogenesis and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026