Steven S. Foster

712 total citations
8 papers, 554 citations indexed

About

Steven S. Foster is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven S. Foster has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 554 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Physiology and 2 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Steven S. Foster's work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (6 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (2 papers). Steven S. Foster is often cited by papers focused on DNA Repair Mechanisms (6 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (2 papers). Steven S. Foster collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Iraq. Steven S. Foster's co-authors include Paul A. Marks, Megan L. Choy, Lang Ngo, John H.J. Petrini, Alessia Balestrini, Takehiko Usui, Mikhajlo K. Zubko, David Lydall, Linda K. Johnson and Saurav De and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular Cell and Molecular and Cellular Biology.

In The Last Decade

Steven S. Foster

8 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steven S. Foster United Kingdom 8 503 132 54 41 41 8 554
Jason A. Lehman United States 13 317 0.6× 135 1.0× 45 0.8× 52 1.3× 23 0.6× 18 427
Landon G. Piluso United States 7 436 0.9× 220 1.7× 63 1.2× 39 1.0× 20 0.5× 7 521
Kristen Bisanz United States 6 287 0.6× 124 0.9× 58 1.1× 47 1.1× 32 0.8× 7 389
David Michod Switzerland 14 393 0.8× 104 0.8× 75 1.4× 63 1.5× 19 0.5× 18 488
Junko Horiguchi‐Yamada Japan 14 300 0.6× 131 1.0× 43 0.8× 29 0.7× 78 1.9× 32 433
André Limnander United States 12 242 0.5× 149 1.1× 40 0.7× 26 0.6× 44 1.1× 17 512
Sabine Häcker Germany 10 438 0.9× 111 0.8× 100 1.9× 20 0.5× 30 0.7× 12 548
Chu Myong Seong South Korea 12 360 0.7× 133 1.0× 51 0.9× 38 0.9× 31 0.8× 30 511
Brittany C. Lipchick United States 9 380 0.8× 100 0.8× 65 1.2× 52 1.3× 17 0.4× 12 500
Angen Liu United States 6 422 0.8× 95 0.7× 94 1.7× 87 2.1× 35 0.9× 6 515

Countries citing papers authored by Steven S. Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven S. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven S. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven S. Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven S. Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven S. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven S. Foster. The network helps show where Steven S. Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven S. Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven S. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven S. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven S. Foster. Steven S. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Evans, Mark D., et al.. (2018). MTH1 deficiency selectively increases non-cytotoxic oxidative DNA damage in lung cancer cells: more bad news than good?. BMC Cancer. 18(1). 423–423. 15 indexed citations
2.
Barton, David B. H., et al.. (2018). PHENOS: a high-throughput and flexible tool for microorganism growth phenotyping on solid media. BMC Microbiology. 18(1). 9–9. 12 indexed citations
3.
Foster, Steven S., Saurav De, Linda K. Johnson, John H.J. Petrini, & Travis H. Stracker. (2012). Cell cycle- and DNA repair pathway-specific effects of apoptosis on tumor suppression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(25). 9953–9958. 48 indexed citations
4.
Foster, Steven S., Alessia Balestrini, & John H.J. Petrini. (2011). Functional Interplay of the Mre11 Nuclease and Ku in the Response to Replication-Associated DNA Damage. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 31(21). 4379–4389. 94 indexed citations
5.
Choy, Megan L., et al.. (2010). Histone deacetylase inhibitor induces DNA damage, which normal but not transformed cells can repair. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107(33). 14639–14644. 293 indexed citations
6.
Usui, Takehiko, Steven S. Foster, & John H.J. Petrini. (2009). Maintenance of the DNA-Damage Checkpoint Requires DNA-Damage-Induced Mediator Protein Oligomerization. Molecular Cell. 33(2). 147–159. 50 indexed citations
7.
Foster, Steven S., Mikhajlo K. Zubko, Sandrine Guillard, & David Lydall. (2006). MRX protects telomeric DNA at uncapped telomeres of budding yeast cdc13-1 mutants. DNA repair. 5(7). 840–851. 27 indexed citations
8.
Zubko, Mikhajlo K., Laura Maringele, Steven S. Foster, & David Lydall. (2006). Detecting Repair Intermediates In Vivo: Effects of DNA Damage Response Genes on Single‐Stranded DNA Accumulation at Uncapped Telomeres in Budding Yeast. Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology. 409. 285–300. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026