Steven E. Mock
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management 16
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 5
- Health top 5%
- Health disparities and outcomes 7
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Demography top 2%
-
- Work-Family Balance Challenges 5
- Sport and Mega-Event Impacts 5
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving 4
-
- Urban Green Space and Health 5
-
- Sports, Gender, and Society 4
Steven E. Mock
51 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 183
- Social Psychology 491
- Health 198
- Clinical Psychology 352
- Demography 176
Countries citing papers authored by Steven E. Mock
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven E. Mock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven E. Mock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven E. Mock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven E. Mock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven E. Mock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven E. Mock. The network helps show where Steven E. Mock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven E. Mock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 101 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 65 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 13 | HUMAN HEALTH AND WELL-BEING MOTIVATIONS AND BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH PROTECTED AREA EXPERIENCES: AN OPPORTUNITY FOR TRANSFORMING POLICY AND MANAGEMENT IN CANADA | 2012 | 36 |
| 14 | 2011 | 77 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 125 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 27 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 18 |
About Steven E. Mock
Steven E. Mock is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Health and Demography, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (16 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (5 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (5 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (4 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (183 citations), Social Psychology (491 citations), Health (198 citations), Clinical Psychology (352 citations) and Demography (176 citations). Steven E. Mock has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Eibach, Margo Hilbrecht, Bryan Smale, Kathrin Boerner, Susan Arai, Emily Schryer, Karl Pillemer, Jori Sechrist, J. Jill Suitor and Tamara B. Pardo. Their work appears in journals such as Leisure/Loisir, Leisure Sciences, Journal of Applied Gerontology, World Leisure Journal and Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.