Steven Creighton

862 citations
22 papers · 672 indexed · h-index 13

Steven Creighton

22 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers

Steven Creighton
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Geophysics 443
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 52
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 30
  • Artificial Intelligence 116
  • Inorganic Chemistry 46
Replace Dean Thomas with:
Dean Thomas United Kingdom
R. Martino Argentina
T. Petrova Russia
Ian A. Bell Australia
Neera Sharma India
David Robertson United States
James G. King Botswana
Kono H. Lemke Hong Kong
W. Ertel Germany
Mario Koch Germany
Steven Creighton relative to Dean Thomas United Kingdom Dean Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Dean Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Creighton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Creighton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Creighton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Creighton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Creighton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Creighton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Creighton. The network helps show where Steven Creighton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven Creighton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven Creighton Line = papers co-authored together Steven Creighton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20191
2 201615
3 20161
4 20167
5 201414
6
Fraser Lakes U-Th-REE mineralization, southeastern Athabasca basement: composition and U-Th-Pb chemical/isotopic ages with consequences for U protore and U/C-type mineralization
20101
7 200972
8 200917
9 20092
10 200839
11 2008123
12 200749
13 200718
14 200736
15 20061
16
2002 Compilation of Alberta Ultramafic Rock Occurrences: Location, Ground Geophysics, Drillhole Logs and Diamond Content
20031
17
Alberta Kimberlite-Indicator Mineral Geochemical Compilation
20021
18 198915
19 1989118
20 198876

About Steven Creighton

Steven Creighton is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geology and Geochemistry and Petrology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (14 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (10 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (8 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (5 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (3 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers) and Mineralogy and Gemology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (443 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (52 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (30 citations). Steven Creighton has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Stachel, Robert W. Luth, A. Warshel, Johan Åqvist, Arieh Warshel, William W. Parson, Sergei Matveev, Heidi E. Höfer, Catherine McCammon and Julien Mercadier. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026