Stephen S. Eikenberry

29.4k total citations
73 papers, 699 citations indexed

About

Stephen S. Eikenberry is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Instrumentation. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen S. Eikenberry has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 699 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 29 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 26 papers in Instrumentation. Recurrent topics in Stephen S. Eikenberry's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (29 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (28 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (24 papers). Stephen S. Eikenberry is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (29 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (28 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (24 papers). Stephen S. Eikenberry collaborates with scholars based in United States, Chile and Mexico. Stephen S. Eikenberry's co-authors include S. Corbel, J. Carson, Ronald A. Remillard, T. L. Hayward, Bernhard R. Brandl, John C. Wilson, Joey Neilsen, Zaven Arzoumanian, P. Uttley and James F. Steiner and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Nature Communications and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Stephen S. Eikenberry

60 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen S. Eikenberry United States 14 595 159 111 89 64 73 699
David Schiminovich United States 16 691 1.2× 158 1.0× 164 1.5× 65 0.7× 77 1.2× 49 826
Soojong Pak South Korea 14 607 1.0× 198 1.2× 154 1.4× 114 1.3× 37 0.6× 83 752
P. Conconi Italy 12 366 0.6× 155 1.0× 83 0.7× 126 1.4× 62 1.0× 108 564
Andrew P. Rasmussen United States 14 488 0.8× 179 1.1× 41 0.4× 116 1.3× 47 0.7× 26 644
Kazunori Ishibashi United States 13 761 1.3× 108 0.7× 50 0.5× 46 0.5× 19 0.3× 30 821
P. Gondoin Netherlands 11 309 0.5× 58 0.4× 61 0.5× 107 1.2× 56 0.9× 52 419
Akihiro Furuzawa Japan 15 487 0.8× 187 1.2× 74 0.7× 58 0.7× 27 0.4× 70 581
Maurice A. Leutenegger United States 18 889 1.5× 208 1.3× 88 0.8× 151 1.7× 21 0.3× 86 1.0k
Y. Clénet France 11 678 1.1× 84 0.5× 151 1.4× 300 3.4× 108 1.7× 29 819
Marshall W. Bautz United States 18 884 1.5× 430 2.7× 142 1.3× 98 1.1× 73 1.1× 76 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen S. Eikenberry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen S. Eikenberry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen S. Eikenberry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen S. Eikenberry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen S. Eikenberry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen S. Eikenberry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen S. Eikenberry. The network helps show where Stephen S. Eikenberry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen S. Eikenberry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen S. Eikenberry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen S. Eikenberry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen S. Eikenberry. Stephen S. Eikenberry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Eikenberry, Stephen S., Stephanos Yerolatsitis, Rodrigo Amezcua‐Correa, et al.. (2024). Photonic quantum-inspired sub-diffraction imager. 26–26.
2.
Eikenberry, Stephen S., et al.. (2023). Controlled short-period orbits around Earth-Moon equilateral libration points for Lunar Occultations. Acta Astronautica. 211. 781–794. 7 indexed citations
3.
Richichi, A., O. Fors, Kamal Patel, et al.. (2023). Lunar occultations events from the Earth–Moon equilateral Lagrangian point: simulations and scientific potential. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 527(3). 6616–6623.
4.
Dong, Chenxing, et al.. (2022). Forecasting cosmic acceleration measurements using the Lyman-α forest. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 514(4). 5493–5505. 10 indexed citations
5.
Gonzalez, Anthony H., et al.. (2020). An Extremely Bright QSO at z = 2.89. The Astrophysical Journal. 899(1). 76–76. 4 indexed citations
6.
Hart, Samuel M., Juan Manuel Urueña, Padraic P. Levings, et al.. (2020). Surface Gel Layers Reduce Shear Stress and Damage of Corneal Epithelial Cells. Tribology Letters. 68(4). 21 indexed citations
7.
Eikenberry, Stephen S., et al.. (2019). PolyOculus: Low-cost Spectroscopy for the Community. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 51(7). 124. 1 indexed citations
8.
Kara, Erin, James F. Steiner, A. C. Fabian, et al.. (2019). The corona contracts in a black-hole transient. Nature. 565(7738). 198–201. 162 indexed citations
9.
Tetarenko, Alexandra J., P. Casella, J. C. A. Miller‐Jones, et al.. (2019). Radio frequency timing analysis of the compact jet in the black hole X-ray binary Cygnus X-1. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 484(3). 2987–3003. 38 indexed citations
10.
Neilsen, Joey, Edward M. Cackett, Ronald A. Remillard, et al.. (2018). A Persistent Disk Wind in GRS 1915+105 with NICER. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 860(2). L19–L19. 12 indexed citations
11.
Eikenberry, Stephen S., et al.. (2018). Optical/X-ray Flux Decoupling in MAXI J1820+070. ATel. 11574. 1.
12.
Sivanandam, Suresh, Dae‐Sik Moon, J. Grunhut, et al.. (2018). The wide integral field infrared spectrograph: commissioning results and on-sky performance. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII. 538. 44–44.
13.
Jolıssaınt, Laurent, et al.. (2017). The Flexible Adaptive Optics Concept. Akademik Açık Erişim (Işık Üniversitesi). 1 indexed citations
14.
Wisniewski, John P., S. Drew Chojnowski, James R. A. Davenport, et al.. (2015). CHARACTERIZING THE RIGIDLY ROTATING MAGNETOSPHERE STARS HD 345439 AND HD 23478. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 811(2). L26–L26. 13 indexed citations
15.
Eikenberry, Stephen S., Scott A. Mullin, John G. Bennett, et al.. (2014). Demonstration of high-performance cryogenic probe arms for deployable IFUs. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9147. 91470X–91470X. 2 indexed citations
16.
Warner, C., et al.. (2013). Redefining the Data Pipeline Using GPUs. ASPC. 475. 79.
17.
Eikenberry, Stephen S., S. N. Raines, A. Marín-Franch, et al.. (2013). STATUS OF THE CANARIAS INFRARED CAMERA EXPERIMENT (CIRCE) FOR THE GRAN TELESCOPIO CANARIAS. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 42. 119–119. 1 indexed citations
18.
Warner, C., et al.. (2012). GPUs and Python: A Recipe for Lightning-Fast Data Pipelines. ASPC. 461. 53.
19.
López, J. A., Salvador Cuevas, J.J Diaz, et al.. (2007). Frida: The first instrument for the adaptive optics system of GTC. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 29. 18–20. 2 indexed citations
20.
Corbel, S. & Stephen S. Eikenberry. (2004). The connection between W31, SGR 1806–20, and LBV 1806–20: Distance,extinction, and structure. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026