Countries citing papers authored by J. C. A. Miller‐Jones
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of J. C. A. Miller‐Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. C. A. Miller‐Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. C. A. Miller‐Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. C. A. Miller‐Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. C. A. Miller‐Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. C. A. Miller‐Jones. The network helps show where J. C. A. Miller‐Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. C. A. Miller‐Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. C. A. Miller‐Jones.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. C. A. Miller‐Jones based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. C. A. Miller‐Jones. J. C. A. Miller‐Jones is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Eijnden, J. van den, N. Degenaar, T. D. Russell, et al.. (2021). A new radio census of neutron star X-ray binaries. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 507(3). 3899–3922.41 indexed citations
Bahramian, Arash, S. Motta, P. Atri, & J. C. A. Miller‐Jones. (2019). Swift observation of the rebrightening in MAXI J1820+070. ATel. 12573. 1.1 indexed citations
9.
Eijnden, J. van den, N. Degenaar, R. Wijnands, et al.. (2018). VLA radio detection of the very-faint X-ray transient IGR J17285-2922. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 11487. 1.
10.
Russell, T. D., J. C. A. Miller‐Jones, G. R. Sivakoff, & Alexandra J. Tetarenko. (2018). ATCA radio detection of the new X-ray transient MAXI J1813-095 as a candidate radio-quiet black hole X-ray binary. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 11356. 1.1 indexed citations
11.
Tetarenko, Alexandra J., T. D. Russell, J. C. A. Miller‐Jones, & G. R. Sivakoff. (2017). Extremely Bright Radio and (Sub-)Millimetre Detections of MAXI J1535-571. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 10745. 1.
12.
Russell, T. D., J. C. A. Miller‐Jones, G. R. Sivakoff, & Alexandra J. Tetarenko. (2017). ATCA radio detection of MAXI J1535-571 indicates it is a strong black hole X-ray binary candidate. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 10711. 1.1 indexed citations
Homan, J., G. R. Sivakoff, D. Pooley, et al.. (2016). Chandra identification of the X-ray transient MAXI J0911-635/Swift J0911.9-6452 in NGC 2808. ATel. 8971. 1.1 indexed citations
15.
Tetarenko, Alexandra J., G. R. Sivakoff, J. C. A. Miller‐Jones, et al.. (2015). Significant Decrease in Intensity and Variability of Millimeter Emission from V404 Cyg. ATel. 7740. 1.3 indexed citations
16.
Miller‐Jones, J. C. A., G. R. Sivakoff, & H. A. Krimm. (2013). VLA detection of radio emission from the new outburst of XTE J1908+094. The astronomer's telegram. 5530. 1.
17.
Russell, D. M., Sera Markoff, P. Casella, et al.. (2012). Jet spectral breaks in black hole X-ray binaries. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 429(1). 815–832.67 indexed citations
18.
Sivakoff, G. R., C. O. Heinke, J. C. A. Miller‐Jones, et al.. (2011). Chandra HRC confirms that M15 X-2 is the currently flaring source in M15. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 3393. 1.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.