Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
IMPROVED REFLECTION MODELS OF BLACK HOLE ACCRETION DISKS: TREATING THE ANGULAR DISTRIBUTION OF X-RAYS
2014436 citationsJavier A. García, Thomas Dauser et al.The Astrophysical Journalprofile →
An Empirical Background Model for the NICER X-Ray Timing Instrument
2022137 citationsRonald A. Remillard, James F. Steiner et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by James F. Steiner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James F. Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James F. Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James F. Steiner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James F. Steiner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James F. Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James F. Steiner. The network helps show where James F. Steiner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James F. Steiner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James F. Steiner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James F. Steiner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James F. Steiner. James F. Steiner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Grindlay, J. E., Brian Allen, Jiarong Hong, et al.. (2020). High Resolution Energetic X-ray Imager SmallSat Pathfinder (HSP) to enable 4piXIO. 235.1 indexed citations
Homan, J., Joseph Neilsen, James F. Steiner, et al.. (2019). A sudden dimming of GRS 1915+105 in X-rays. The astronomer's telegram. 12742. 1.2 indexed citations
Homan, J., D. Altamirano, Zaven Arzoumanian, et al.. (2018). NICER observations of MAXI J1820+070 : Continuing evolution of X-ray variability properties. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 11576. 1.1 indexed citations
13.
Ludlam, R. M., J. M. Mïller, Zaven Arzoumanian, et al.. (2018). Detection of Reflection Features in the Neutron Star Low-mass X-Ray Binary Serpens X-1 with <i>NICER</i>. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).46 indexed citations
Ludlam, R. M., J. M. Mïller, Zaven Arzoumanian, et al.. (2018). Initial NICER observation of the new X-ray transient Swift J1858.6-0814. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 12158. 1.
16.
Homan, J., P. Uttley, Keith C. Gendreau, et al.. (2018). A rapid state transition in MAXI J1820+070. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 11820. 1.3 indexed citations
17.
Gendreau, Keith C., Zaven Arzoumanian, C. B. Markwardt, et al.. (2017). Initial NICER observations of a broadened iron line and QPOs in MAXI J1535a571.. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 10768. 1.1 indexed citations
18.
Prigozhin, G., James F. Steiner, Andrew Malonis, et al.. (2017). Calibration of NICER detectors at the synchrotron radiation facility BESSY-II. 16.
Macias, Phillip, Jerome A. Orosz, Charles D. Bailyn, et al.. (2011). A Refined Black Hole Mass for the X-ray Transient GRS 1009-45. AAS. 217.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.