Stephen Quirke

154 total papers · 1.2k total citations
50 papers, 321 citations indexed

About

Stephen Quirke is a scholar working on Archeology, Sociology and Political Science and Religious studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Quirke has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 321 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Archeology, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Religious studies. Recurrent topics in Stephen Quirke's work include Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (41 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (32 papers) and Ancient Near East History (12 papers). Stephen Quirke is often cited by papers focused on Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (41 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (32 papers) and Ancient Near East History (12 papers). Stephen Quirke collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Stephen Quirke's co-authors include Mark Collier, Sebastian K.T.S. Wärmländer, David Scott, Joy Mazurek, Anthony Spalinger, Vanessa Smith, Janine Bourriau, John V. Reynolds, J. D. Ray and Harry Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Archaeological Science and Visual Communication.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Quirke

38 papers receiving 249 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Stephen Quirke 274 51 49 33 29 50 321
Christopher Brooke 115 0.4× 95 1.9× 113 2.3× 10 0.3× 54 1.9× 30 294
James W. Allan 268 1.0× 79 1.5× 70 1.4× 56 1.7× 49 1.7× 24 329
Itamar Taxel 202 0.7× 37 0.7× 10 0.2× 29 0.9× 39 1.3× 50 260
Aidan Dodson 287 1.0× 7 0.1× 14 0.3× 27 0.8× 25 0.9× 80 336
Massimo Vidale 187 0.7× 36 0.7× 23 0.5× 92 2.8× 13 0.4× 64 325
Lucy Blue 216 0.8× 25 0.5× 38 0.8× 108 3.3× 62 2.1× 52 312
Robert Ousterhout 175 0.6× 15 0.3× 7 0.1× 76 2.3× 9 0.3× 51 310
Jonathan M. Bloom 162 0.6× 10 0.2× 17 0.3× 44 1.3× 11 0.4× 41 229
Alexander Nagel 60 0.2× 28 0.5× 33 0.7× 41 1.2× 5 0.2× 27 273
Mark L. Lawall 243 0.9× 34 0.7× 21 0.4× 76 2.3× 22 0.8× 24 286

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Quirke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Quirke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Quirke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Quirke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Quirke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Quirke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Quirke. The network helps show where Stephen Quirke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Quirke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Quirke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Quirke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Quirke. Stephen Quirke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026