Mark Collier
Impact in
- Archeology top 5%
- Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Archaeology and Historical Studies
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Ancient Near East History
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Papers in
-
- Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 6
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 3
-
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 3
- Co-authors
- Stephen Quirke (3 shared papers)C. Price (1 shared paper)Michael Magee (1 shared paper)Anthony Spalinger (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology (2 papers)Philosophical Psychology (1 paper)Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (1 paper)Hume studies (3 papers)The Journal of mind and behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark Collier
16 papers receiving 78 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Archeology 50
- History and Philosophy of Science 9
- Archeology 2
- Theoretical Computer Science 2
- Philosophy 18
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Collier
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Collier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Collier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Collier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Collier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Collier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Collier. The network helps show where Mark Collier may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Mark Collier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 4 | How to Read Egyptian Hieroglyphs: A Step-by-Step Guide to Teach Yourself | 1998 | 9 |
| 5 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 6 | Ramesside Studies in Honour of K. A. Kitchen | 2011 | 8 |
| 7 | Hume's Theory of Moral Imagination | 2010 | 6 |
| 8 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 10 | Two Puzzles in Hume's Epistemology | 2008 | 4 |
| 11 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 15 | Why history matters: Associations and causal judgment in Hume and cognitive science | 2007 | 1 |
| 16 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 17 | Hume's Legacy: A Cognitive Science Perspective | 2018 | 1 |
| 18 | 1990 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 0 |
About Mark Collier
Mark Collier is a scholar working on Archeology, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 107 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (6 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (50 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (9 citations), Archeology (2 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations) and Philosophy (18 citations). Mark Collier has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Quirke, C. Price, Michael Magee and Anthony Spalinger. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Philosophical Psychology, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Hume studies and The Journal of mind and behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.