Stephen Long
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Physiology top 10%
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Papers in ⓘ
- Music 2
- Co-authors
- Malcolm Stoker (4 shared papers)Cathelijne Alleman (1 shared paper)Floortje van Nooten (1 shared paper)Nathaniel P. Katz (3 shared papers)Robert Snijder (3 shared papers)Jessica Robinson‐Papp (1 shared paper)Joanna Van (1 shared paper)David M. Simpson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- European Journal of Pharmacology (2 papers)Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin (1 paper)Journal of Pain (1 paper)BMC Neurology (1 paper)Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen Long
14 papers receiving 472 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Neurology 217
- Physiology 280
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 126
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 32
- Pharmacology 79
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Long
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Long's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Long with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Long more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Long
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Long. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Long. The network helps show where Stephen Long may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Long, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 161 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 103 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 32 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 0 |
About Stephen Long
Stephen Long is a scholar working on Music, Biological Psychiatry, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (217 citations), Physiology (280 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (126 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (32 citations) and Pharmacology (79 citations). Stephen Long has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm Stoker, Cathelijne Alleman, Floortje van Nooten, Nathaniel P. Katz, Robert Snijder, Jessica Robinson‐Papp, Joanna Van, David M. Simpson, Chris G. Kruse and Andrew C. McCreary. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Journal of Pain, BMC Neurology and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.