Malcolm Stoker
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
- Physiology top 5%
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Papers in
- Physiology 13
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 13
- Neurology 11
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders 11
- Co-authors
- Stephen Long (4 shared papers)Floortje van Nooten (2 shared papers)Nathaniel P. Katz (6 shared papers)Mark Versavel (1 shared paper)Hilary A. Feister (1 shared paper)James P. Young (1 shared paper)Robert van Seventer (1 shared paper)Cathelijne Alleman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Clinical Journal of Pain (3 papers)Neuropharmacology (2 papers)Clinical Therapeutics (2 papers)Pain (1 paper)Journal of Pain (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Malcolm Stoker
17 papers receiving 922 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Neurology 406
- Physiology 690
- Sensory Systems 106
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 100
- Pharmacology 204
Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Stoker
This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Stoker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Stoker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Stoker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Stoker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Stoker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Stoker. The network helps show where Malcolm Stoker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Stoker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 202 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 161 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 103 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 80 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 69 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 68 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 53 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 42 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 24 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 14 | 1982 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 0 |
About Malcolm Stoker
Malcolm Stoker is a scholar working on Physiology, Neurology, Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Oncology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 966 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (13 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (11 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (406 citations), Physiology (690 citations), Sensory Systems (106 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (100 citations) and Pharmacology (204 citations). Malcolm Stoker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Long, Floortje van Nooten, Nathaniel P. Katz, Mark Versavel, Hilary A. Feister, James P. Young, Robert van Seventer, Cathelijne Alleman, Jeremiah Trudeau and Florence Paillard. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Journal of Pain, Neuropharmacology, Clinical Therapeutics, Pain and Journal of Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.