Stephen L. Dobson
- Insect Science top 0.05%
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 68
- Insect and Pesticide Research 31
- Insect behavior and control techniques 15
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 9
- Horticulture top 1%
-
- Mosquito-borne diseases and control 52
- Nephrology top 2%
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment 8
-
- Insect Pest Control Strategies 7
-
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 5
Stephen L. Dobson
82 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Insect Science 4.3k
- Horticulture 84
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2.4k
- Nephrology 240
- Infectious Diseases 452
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Dobson
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Dobson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Dobson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Dobson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Dobson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Dobson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Dobson. The network helps show where Stephen L. Dobson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen L. Dobson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 4 | Wolbachia-based strategies to control insect pests and disease vectors | 2015 | 36 |
| 5 | 2014 | 87 | |
| 6 | An update on the utility of Wolbachia for controlling insect vectors and disease transmission | 2013 | 6 |
| 7 | 2013 | 242 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 47 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 13 | Sterile-Insect Methods for Control of Mosquito-Borne Diseases: An Analysisbreakdown → | 2009 | 382 |
| 14 | 2008 | 71 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 229 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 318 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 1 |
About Stephen L. Dobson
Stephen L. Dobson is a scholar working on Insect Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 82 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (68 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (52 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (31 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (15 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (9 papers), Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (8 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (7 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (4.3k citations), Horticulture (84 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (2.4k citations). Stephen L. Dobson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Zhiyong Xi, Scott L. O’Neill, Cynthia Khoo, Weiguo Zhou, Henk R. Braig, Corey L. Brelsfoard, Eric J. Marsland, Laurent Gavotte, James W. Mains and Yan Xie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.